Madame Roland: A Biographical StudyTarbell, Ida M. (Ida Minerva)
History
Madame Roland: A Biographical Study
Tarbell, Ida M. (Ida Minerva)
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799; Roland, Madame, 1754-1793
Feeling as they did, the only logical thing for them was to struggle to
obtain power. If they were the “Providence” of France, it was their duty
to get to the front. It was not for the sake of power that they made
this effort. It was because they alone in their own judgment were
sufficiently virtuous and enlightened to carry out the doctrines. They
were “called” to preach liberty and a republic, and they went to their
work in the same frame of exaltation and expectation as he goes who
preaches the Kingdom of Heaven.
The only way in which they could arrive at power was by uniting with one
of the two parties in the Assembly, with the constitutionalists or the
Mountain, as the Radicals were termed. The former was composed of the
well-to-do and the experienced men of the Assembly. It supported the
King. It was the more honest and trustworthy, but it was accused of
“aspiring secretly to increase the royal authority and to form two
chambers.”
The Mountain was the party of the agitators and the street. It had the
audacity, the violence, and the populace of the faubourgs. The talents,
education, eloquence, refinement, of the Gironde were in harmony with
the conservatives, but they could not believe that there was not a
secret plot hidden under the patriotic pretensions of the
constitutionalists. Their self-pride was irritated, too, by the
aristocratic traditions, the courtly manners, and the reasonableness of
the moderates. There was a subtile superiority in their wisdom, their
gracious bearing, their _finesse_ which the Girondins resented.
As for the Mountain the Girondins feared its violence, its open advocacy
of bloodshed less than they did its suspicion. They wanted to be
considered the purest of the patriots and they could not support the
idea that there was any one who pushed farther than they in making
claims for the “sovereign” and for the “divine right of insurrection.”
They had not the practical sense, the experience, and the
disinterestedness to judge the Mountain, to see that it was chaotic,
violent, irrational. Because it called itself the representative of the
poor and the suffering, they imagined that it must be virtuous, and they
wished its support. They feared its opinion of them even more than they
feared the skeleton in the conservative closet.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account