Madame Roland: A Biographical StudyTarbell, Ida M. (Ida Minerva)
History
Madame Roland: A Biographical Study
Tarbell, Ida M. (Ida Minerva)
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799; Roland, Madame, 1754-1793
In order to secure the grant of nobility, a favorable recommendation to
the King from the Royal Counsel of Commerce, of which body the
_conseiller ordinaire_ was M. de Calonne, _Contrôleur-général des
finances_, was necessary. To obtain this all possible recommendations
must be brought to M. de Calonne’s attention; particularly was it
necessary to cultivate the directors of commerce, with whom the
Controller-general consulted freely, and on whom he depended for advice.
They had arranged, before she left Amiens, a list of the people upon
whom they could rely directly or indirectly for letters of introduction
and for other favors.
No sooner was she settled than she began the work of seeing them. At the
very commencement she encountered prejudice and irritation against
Roland. One of her friends, who evidently had been investigating affairs
ahead, assured her that Roland was viewed everywhere with
dissatisfaction, and that the common opinion was, though he did a great
deal of work, he did not know how to keep his place. One of the
directors told her: “Take care how you present him to us as a superior
man. It is his pretension, but we are far from judging him as such.”
“Pedantry, insupportable vanity, eagerness for glory, pretensions of all
sorts, obstinacy, perpetual contradiction, bad writer, bad politician,
determination to regulate everything, incapable of subordination,” were
among the criticisms upon her husband, to which Madame Roland had to
listen.
All of these complaints she faced squarely, writing them to Roland with
a frankness which is half-amusing, half-suspicious. One wonders if she
is not taking advantage of the situation to tell her husband some
wholesome truths about himself. She did not hesitate, in repeating these
criticisms, to add frequent counsels, which support the suspicion and
show how thoroughly she realized the danger of Roland’s fault-finding
irritation. “Above all, as I told you before my departure, do not get
angry in your letters, and let me see them before they are sent. You
must not irritate them any more. Your pride is well enough known, show
them your good nature now.”
The criticisms on Roland’s character did not disconcert her. She pressed
ahead, talked, reasoned, urged, obtained promises; in short, showed
herself an admirable intrigante. She was afraid of no one. “As for my
rôle, I know it so well that I could defend it before the King without
being embarrassed by his crown,” she wrote Roland. After she had secured
what she wanted from each person, she did her best to keep them
friendly; for she had decided to ask for a pension if she did not secure
the letters. She succeeded admirably, even M. de Tolozan, one of the
directors whom she called her “bear,” telling her one day: “You have
lost nothing by this trip, Madame. We all do honor to your honesty and
your intelligence, and I am very glad to have made your acquaintance.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account