Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan — John Shaqi
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
Jomini was not merely a military theorist, who saw war from the outside;
he was a distinguished and thoughtful soldier, in the prime of life
during the Napoleonic wars, and of a contemporary reputation such that,
when he deserted the cause of the emperor, he was taken at once into a
high position as a confidential adviser of the allied sovereigns. Yet
what does he say of strategy? Strategy is to him the queen of military
sciences; it underlies the fortunes of every campaign. As in a building,
which, however fair and beautiful the superstructure, is radically
marred and imperfect if the foundation be insecure—so, if the strategy
be wrong, the skill of the general on the battlefield, the valor of the
soldier, the brilliancy of victory, however otherwise decisive, fail of
their effect. Yet how does he define strategy, the effects of which, if
thus far-reaching, must surely be esteemed “practical”? “Strategy,” he
said, “is the art of making war upon the map. It precedes the operations
of the campaign, the clash of arms on the field. It is done in the
cabinet, it is the work of the student, with his dividers in his hand
and his information lying beside him.” In other words, it originates in
a mental process, but it does not end there; therefore it is practical.
Most of us have heard an anecdote of the great Napoleon, which is
nevertheless so apt to my purpose that I must risk the repetition.
Having had no time to verify my reference, I must quote from memory, but
of substantial accuracy I am sure. A few weeks before one of his early
and most decisive campaigns, his secretary, Bourrienne, entered the
office and found the First Consul, as he then was, stretched on the
floor with a large map before him. Pricked over the map, in what to
Bourrienne was confusion, were a number of red and black pins. After a
short silence the secretary, who was an old friend of school days, asked
him what it all meant. The Consul laughed goodnaturedly, called him a
fool, and said: “This set of pins represents the Austrians and this the
French. On such a day I shall leave Paris. My troops will then be in
such positions. On a certain day,” naming it, “I shall be here,”
pointing, “and my troops will have moved there. At such a time I shall
cross the mountains, a few days later my army will be here, the
Austrians will have done thus and so; and at a certain date I will beat
them here,” placing a pin. Bourrienne said nothing, perhaps he may have
thought the matter not “practical;” but a few weeks later, after the
battle (Marengo, I think) had been fought, he was seated with the
general in his military traveling carriage. The programme had been
carried out, and he recalled the incident to Bonaparte’s mind. The
latter himself smiled at the singular accuracy of his predictions in the
particular instance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account