Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
Now I say, that, while all this was bad management in the face of the
enemy, and in so far bad tactics, the bad tactics issued from an error
of strategy; and the error in strategy was due to the lack of unity of
conception, of that exclusiveness of purpose, which is the essence of
strategy, and which subordinates, adjusts, all other factors and
considerations to the one exclusive aim. While writing these pages, I
came across a few lines by one of the first of German philosophical
historians, Ranke, in one of his greatest works, “England in the
Seventeenth Century.” They apply to policy, but policy is twin brother
to strategy. Permit me to quote them:
“Why did William III get the better of James II in Ireland? Because he
always kept his one great idea before his eyes, amid the many perplexing
circumstances, which surrounded him. The decision which he displayed at
every moment rested upon the fact that he had _only one end_, and that
the one _imposed by the course of things_.”
[Illustration: SCENE OF NAVAL WAR JAPAN AND RUSSIA]
Apply this to Rozhestvensky. The one end imposed on him by the course of
things was the destruction of the Japanese fleet, which comprised every
armored vessel Japan could possibly muster for that war. Togo’s
signal[105] before the battle recognized this one end, and there was no
reason why his opponent should not have recognized it equally. To reach
Vladivostok was only a means to that end; an object most important,
because, if attained, it would put the Russians in the best possible
condition for battle. But this by no means superseded the one necessary
aim,—battle. More, it did not even postpone that aim, as a matter of
immediate consideration and preparation; for, though escape through to
Vladivostok might be possible, it was not certain. It was not even
probable, under all the conditions. Therefore, while every forethought
and care should have been to effect escape, if possible, they should
have been accompanied with the clear decision that, should battle be
forced, the fighting should have been qualified by no thought of escape,
and the fleet, like a ship cleared for action, should have been stripped
of all fleet encumbrances from the moment of leaving the Saddles. A
fleet is half beaten already when it goes into battle with one eye upon
something else than fighting.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account