Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
Numerous and deep harbors are a source of strength and wealth, and
doubly so if they are the outlets of navigable streams, which facilitate
the concentration in them of a country’s internal trade; but by their
very accessibility they become a source of weakness in war, if not
properly defended. The Dutch in 1667 found little difficulty in
ascending the Thames and burning a large fraction of the English navy
within sight of London; whereas a few years later the combined fleets of
England and France, when attempting a landing in Holland, were foiled by
the difficulties of the coast as much as by the valor of the Dutch
fleet. In 1778 the harbor of New York, and with it undisputed control of
the Hudson River, would have been lost to the English, who were caught
at disadvantage, but for the hesitancy of the French admiral. With that
control, New England would have been restored to close and safe
communication with New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania; and this
blow, following so closely on Burgoyne’s disaster of the year before,
would probably have led the English to make an earlier peace. The
Mississippi is a mighty source of wealth and strength to the United
States; but the feeble defenses of its mouth and the number of its
subsidiary streams penetrating the country made it a weakness and source
of disaster to the Southern Confederacy. And lastly, in 1814, the
occupation of the Chesapeake and the destruction of Washington gave a
sharp lesson of the dangers incurred through the noblest water-ways, if
their approaches be undefended; a lesson recent enough to be easily
recalled, but which, from the present appearance of the coast defenses,
seems to be yet more easily forgotten. Nor should it be thought that
conditions have changed; circumstances and details of offense and
defense have been modified, in these days as before, but the great
conditions remain the same.
Before and during the great Napoleonic wars, France had no port for
ships-of-the-line east of Brest. How great the advantage to England,
which in the same stretch has two great arsenals, at Plymouth and at
Portsmouth, besides other harbors of refuge and supply. This defect of
conformation has since been remedied by the works at Cherbourg.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account