Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan — John Shaqi
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
Besides the contour of the coast, involving easy access to the sea,
there are other physical conditions which lead people to the sea or turn
them from it. Although France was deficient in military ports on the
Channel, she had both there and on the ocean, as well as in the
Mediterranean, excellent harbors, favorably situated for trade abroad,
and at the outlet of large rivers, which would foster internal traffic.
But when Richelieu had put an end to civil war, Frenchmen did not take
to the sea with the eagerness and success of the English and Dutch. A
principal reason for this has been plausibly found in the physical
conditions which have made France a pleasant land, with a delightful
climate, producing within itself more than its people needed. England,
on the other hand, received from Nature but little, and, until her
manufactures were developed, had little to export. Their many wants,
combined with their restless activity and other conditions that favored
maritime enterprise, led her people abroad; and they there found lands
more pleasant and richer than their own. Their needs and genius made
them merchants and colonists, then manufacturers and producers; and
between products and colonies shipping is the inevitable link. So their
sea power grew. But if England was drawn to the sea, Holland was driven
to it; without the sea England languished, but Holland died. In the
height of her greatness, when she was one of the chief factors in
European politics, a competent native authority estimated that the soil
of Holland could not support more than one eighth of her inhabitants.
The manufactures of the country were then numerous and important, but
they had been much later in their growth than the shipping interest. The
poverty of the soil and the exposed nature of the coast drove the Dutch
first to fishing. Then the discovery of the process of curing the fish
gave them material for export as well as home consumption, and so laid
the corner-stone of their wealth. Thus they had become traders at the
time that the Italian republics, under the pressure of Turkish power and
the discovery of the passage round the Cape of Good Hope, were beginning
to decline, and they fell heirs to the great Italian trade of the
Levant. Further favored by their geographical position, intermediate
between the Baltic, France, and the Mediterranean, and at the mouth of
the German rivers, they quickly absorbed nearly all the carrying-trade
of Europe. The wheat and naval stores of the Baltic, the trade of Spain
with her colonies in the New World, the wines of France, and the French
coasting-trade were, little more than two hundred years ago, transported
in Dutch shipping. Much of the carrying-trade of England, even, was then
done in Dutch bottoms. It will not be pretended that all this prosperity
proceeded only from the poverty of Holland’s natural resources.
Something does not grow from nothing. What is true, is, that by the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account