Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
Thus, in theory, and to make execution perfect,—to capture, so to say,
Nelson’s eleventh ship,—the aim must be to drive the enemy out of every
foothold in the whole theater of war, and particularly to destroy or
shut up his fleet. Having accomplished the great feature of the task by
getting hold of the most decisive position, further effort must be
directed towards, possibly not upon, those points which may serve him
still for bases. In so doing, your fleet must not be divided, unless
overwhelmingly strong, and must not extend its lines of communication
beyond the power of protecting them, unless it be for a dash of limited
duration.
If compelled to choose between fortified ports of the enemy and his
fleet, the latter will be regarded as the true objective; but a blockade
of the ports, or an attack upon them, may be the surest means of
bringing the ships within reach. Thus, in the War of American
Independence, the siege of Gibraltar compelled the British fleet on more
than one occasion to come within fighting reach of the enemy’s
blockading fleet, in order to throw in supplies. That the allies did not
attack, except on one occasion, does not invalidate the lesson. Corbett
in his “Seven Years’ War” points out very justly, in Byng’s celebrated
failure, which cost him his life, that if he had moved against the
French transports, in a neighboring bay, the French admiral would have
had to attack, and the result might have been more favorable to the
British. Such movements are essentially blows at the communications of
the enemy, and if aimed without unduly risking your own will be in
thorough accord with the most assured principles of strategy. A
militarily effective blockade of a base essential to the enemy will
force his fleet either to fight or to abandon the theater of war. Thus,
as has been pointed out elsewhere, in Suffren’s campaign in Indian Seas,
so long as Trincomalee was in possession of the British, a threat at it
was sure to bring them out to fight, although it was not their principal
base. The abandonment of the theater of war by the navy will cause the
arsenal to fall in time, through failure of resources, as Gibraltar must
have fallen if the British fleet had not returned and supplied it at
intervals. Such a result, however, is less complete than a victory over
the enemy’s navy, which would lead to the same end, and so be a double
success, ships _and_ port.
9. THE VALUE OF THE DEFENSIVE[28]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account