Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
It is true that in certain respects the defensive has advantages, the
possession of which may even justify an expression, which has been
stated as a maxim of war, that “Defense is a stronger form of war than
Offense is.” I do not like the expression, for it seems to me misleading
as to the determinative characteristics of a defensive attitude; but it
may pass, if properly qualified. What is meant by it is that in a
particular operation, or even in a general plan, the party on the
defense, since he makes no forward movement for the time, can strengthen
his preparations, make deliberate and permanent dispositions; while the
party on the offensive, being in continual movement, is more liable to
mistake, of which the defense may take advantage, and in any case has to
accept as part of his problem the disadvantage, to him, of the
accumulated preparations that the defense has been making while he has
been marching. The extreme example of preparation is a fortified
permanent post; but similar instances are found in a battle field
carefully chosen for advantages of ground, where attack is awaited, and
in a line of ships, which by the solidarity of its order, and deployment
of broadside, awaits an enemy who has to approach in column with
disadvantage as to train of guns. In so far, the _form_ taken by the
defense is stronger than the _form_ assumed for the moment by the
offense.
If you will think clearly, you will recognize that at Tsushima the
Japanese were on the defensive, for their object was to stop, to thwart,
the Russian attempt. Essentially, whatever the tactical method they
adopted, they were to spread their broadsides across the road to
Vladivostok, and await. The Russians were on the offensive, little as we
are accustomed so to regard them; they had to get through to
Vladivostok—if they could. They had to hold their course to the place,
and to break through the Japanese,—if they could. In short, they were on
the offensive, and the form of their approach had to be in column, bows
on,—a weaker form,—which they had to abandon, tactically, as soon as
they came under fire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account