p. 18. Compare De Quincey’s answer to Hazlitt in _London Magazine_, 1823 (vol. viii. pp. 349, 459, 569, 586). Footnote 832: Senior, _Lect. on Pop._, p. 35. Footnote 833: _Population_, I. iv. p. 27 (1820). Footnote 834: Cf. also speech on 9th April, 1816. Hansard, _sub dato_, p. 1109. Footnote 835: See above, p. 75. Cf. also above, pp. 142 _seq._, on Emigration. Footnote 836: Godwin, _Popn._, I. xiii. 106. Cf. I. iv. 22, II. ii. 142, VI. vi. 585. Footnote 837: Hawick, 1807, especially p. 84. Footnote 838: Sadler, _Popn._, I. i. 15 (1830). Footnote 839: Append. to 3rd ed., 1806; 7th ed., p. 485; cf. pp. 395, 446, and al. Footnote 840: See Appendix to ed. 1826, 7th ed., p. 627. Footnote 841: _Life_, ii. 271. Footnote 842: _l. c._ p. 259. Footnote 843: _Life_, ii. 259, 260. Cf. what Godwin writes to Sir John Sinclair, July 1821 (Sinclair’s _Correspondence_, i. 393). Footnote 844: _l. c._ p. 271. Footnote 845: Morgan and Rosser, _e. g._ See _Life_, ii. 272–5; cf. p. 280. Footnote 846: _Edin. Rev._, July 1821, p. 364. Footnote 847: _Life of Godwin_, ii. 274 Footnote 848: _Ibid._, pp. 274–5. Footnote 849: No. 1, Oct 1802, esp. p. 26. Footnote 850: _Population_, I. i. Footnote 851: Appendix to 3rd ed., p. 520 n.; 7th ed., p. 491 n. Footnote 852: See his Letter to Godwin, dated October 1818, and quoted in Godwin’s _Population_, Bk. II. ch. i pp. 116–123, with comments. Footnote 853: See above, p. 66. Footnote 854: _Population_, II. x. 244–7. Footnote 855: _E. g._ II. xi. 274, 282, but especially I. iv. 25, and for the third argument, pp. 29, 30, cf. pp. 43–50, &c. Cf. also Godwin to Sinclair in Sinclair’s _Correspondence_, i. 393. Footnote 856: Population tends to double in a bundled years, and there is no risk of over-population except in occasional times of dull trade (Letter of Godwin to Sinclair, Sinclair’s _Correspondence_, _l. c._). A notable exception. Footnote 857: _Population_, II. xi. 251–2. Footnote 858: IV. i. Footnote 859: II. ii. 127, and cf. above. Footnote 860: II. xi. 287, &c., &c. Footnote 861: III. iii. 327 _seq._ Footnote 862: _Coups d’état_ in nature. Paul Bert, _L’Enseignement Primaire_, 1880, p. xxviii. Footnote 863: _Edinburgh Review_, July 1821. Cf. Letter to the Rev. T. R. Malthus by David Booth (1823), who absurdly assumes Malthus to be the reviewer. Though internal evidence dispels this fancy, it shows that Malthus was still believed to write for the _Edinburgh Review_. Footnote 864: Others, in _Table Talk_ and _Biogr. Literaria_, are chiefly declamation. Footnote 865: In these quotations the capitals are in the original, and the italics correspond to underlinings. Footnote 866: