Malthus, T. R. (Thomas Robert), 1766-1834; Malthusianism
Footnote 892:
_Travels in France_, pp. 408–9 (ed. 1792) and al.
Footnote 893:
_Essay on Pop._, 7th ed., pp. 449, 451 _seq._; _Annals of
Agriculture_, no. 239, pp. 219 _seq._ (quoted in _Essay_, App. pp.
496–7). Young had reproached Malthus for denying the right to relief.
Footnote 894:
_Travels in France_, ed. 1792, pp. 438–9.
Footnote 895:
App. to _Essay_, pp. 499, 500. It is not true that “Owen was right _as
against Malthus_ when he regarded a certain amount of comfort as the
indispensable condition of a moral life, and thought that a
considerable increase of man’s powers of production was possible”
(Held, _Soc. Gesch. Englands_, pp. 351–2). Malthus himself did both.
Footnote 896:
The _Plan_ is quoted by Cobbett, _Pol. Reg._, Dec. 14, 1816. Malthus
(_Pol. Ec._ (1820), pp. 434, 435, (1836) p. 378) thinks that
“co-proprietorship” of Government with the landlords, after the scheme
of the Economists and on the analogy of Oriental “sole
proprietorship,” might become too ready an engine of taxation for a
military despotism.
Footnote 897:
See above, pp. 87, 112, &c.
Footnote 898:
_Essay_, 7th ed., p. 284.
Footnote 899:
_E. g._ by Bagehot, _Econ. Stud._ (1880), pp. 135 _seq._, and by
Southey in Aikin’s _Annual Review_ above quoted.
Footnote 900:
III. iii. 286. This and the rest of his argument (even its application
to Civil Liberty) is to be found in Aristotle, _Politics_, ii. 3 and
4, but esp. 5. δεὶ δὲ μηδὲ τοῦτο λανθάνειν, &c.
Footnote 901:
_Essay on Pop._, 7th ed., p. 282.
Footnote 902:
See above, p. 24.
Footnote 903:
_Genesis of Species_, 2nd ed., 1871, p. 5.
Footnote 904:
The puzzling effect of counting up one’s great-grandfathers and
great-grandmothers up to the twentieth degree or so is described by
Blackstone as quoted by Godwin (_Popn._) and re-quoted by Hazlitt
(_Spirit of the Age_, 1825, p. 273, ‘Godwin’). The puzzle is less if
we remember that our remote ancestors must have married into each
other’s families, or rather were scions in the end of the same
families. We cannot go back to a single pair except through the
“prohibited degrees.”
Footnote 905:
We are to understand, therefore, that Malthus and the author agree
_that_ population needs a check, and are simply not agreed _what_ the
checks are to be.
Footnote 906:
See below, p. 392.
Footnote 907:
See above, p. 370. The sixteen positions not touched in their own
place will be met by a reference to the following places in this book:
i. to p. 20, add _Essay_, 2nd ed. Bk. III. ch. iii. p. 383, ii. to p.
37, iii. to p. 338, iv. to pp. 51, 78, v. to p. 80, vi. to p. 83,
viii. to p. 113, ix. to p. 376, x. to p. 67, xi. to pp. 231, 297, see
_Essay_, 7th ed. p. 381, xii. to pp. 70, 75, 91, xiii. to p. 393, xiv.
to pp. 91, 270, xv. to p. 294, xvi. to p. 69, and xvii. to p. 75.
Footnote 908:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account