_Das Kapital_, 7ter Abschn. 23tes Kap. pp. 653 _seq._ (ed. 1872); cf. 646 _seq._ Footnote 909: The language of Ricardo, ch. xxxi. p. 236 (quoted by Marx, p. 656 n.). Cf. above, p. 297. Cf. also Marx, pp. 427 foll. Footnote 910: Cf. what Prof. Rogers says in _Six Centuries_, p. 229, of the attempt made in the fifteenth century to increase the “residuum” of agricultural labour for the benefit of the farmers and landlords. Also above, p. 164 n. Footnote 911: Marx, _ibid._, p. 659. Footnote 912: Misprinted in Marx as 254. Footnote 913: See above, pp. 137, 188, &c. Footnote 914: See above, p. 335. Footnote 915: See above, pp. 299, 335, &c. Footnote 916: _Das Kap._, p. 549 n. Footnote 917: _Das Kap._, p. 641 n. Footnote 918: The passage omitted is neither true nor decent. Footnote 919: G. M. Ortes _Reflessioni sulla popolazione_ (1790). Footnote 920: _Das Kap._, p. 549 n. Footnote 921: Cf. above, p. 382, and Malthus, _Essay_, 2nd ed. III. iii. 386, where he says that Duty and Interest must work together. Footnote 922: ‘Theory of Population,’ in _Westminster Rev._, April 1852, pirated by the German Professor Trall in 1877 (_Eine neue Bevölkerungstheorie_), and substantially maintained by its author (Mr. Herbert Spencer) in _Principles of Biology_, Vol. II. Part vi., ‘Laws of Multiplication.’ Footnote 923: _Essay_, 7th ed., p. 269. Footnote 924: Above, p. 377. Footnote 925: _E. g._ Hazlitt, _Reply to Essay on Population_, p. 20. Footnote 926: W. R. Greg, _Enigmas of Life_, 8th ed., 1874, pp. 58 _seq._ This was nearly Godwin’s position in his first reply. Footnote 927: Sadler on _Population_, and Reply to _Edinburgh Review_. Godwin, _Population_, Bk. VI. ch. ii., &c. Footnote 928: Carey (H. C.), _Princ. of Social Science_ (1858), vol. i. ch. xiv.; cf. above, p. 74 _seq._ H. George, _Progress and Poverty_, pp. 115, 116. Sadler, p. 70, &c. Footnote 929: Godwin, Sadler, &c. Footnote 930: Sadler, pp. 354–5, &c. Cf. Adam Smith, _W. of N._, I. viii. 36. See above, pp. 82, 83. Footnote 931: Godwin, see above, p. 361. Southey, _Life and Corresp._, III. 188. Bagehot, _Econ. Studies_, pp. 133 _seq._ Cf. George, II. ii. 94. Above, pp. 362, 381. Footnote 932: Besant, _Law of Population_, ch. iii. Cf. Malthus, pp. 407 _seq._ (IV. iv.); Cobbett, _Taking Leave of his Countrymen_ (1817), p. 6; _Political Register_, 4th Jan. 1817, p. 26, &c., &c. Above, p. 329. Footnote 933: Godwin, _Population_, passim. George, II. ii. 102, 109. Above, pp. 111, 112. Footnote 934: Godwin, _ibid._; George, pp. 138, 259, &c., &c.; Coleridge, MS. note to p. 358 (of _Essay_, 2nd ed.), where for “physical constitution of our nature” he would read, “in the existing system of society.” So verbatim Southey in Aikin’s _Ann. Rev._ _l. c._ Footnote 935: