Man's supreme inheritance : $b Conscious guidance and control in relation to human evolution in civilizationAlexander, F. Matthias (Frederick Matthias)
Science
Man's supreme inheritance : $b Conscious guidance and control in relation to human evolution in civilization
The abnormal condition referred to is more or less governed by the
senses through the subconsciousness and we must remember that the great
controlling forces in the animal kingdom are chiefly _physical_. It is
also in keeping with the purely animal stage of evolution, and any
advance from this stage demands that the balance of powers must
gradually move in favour of the mental.
The controlling and guiding forces in savage four-footed animals and in
the savage black races are practically the same; and this serves to show
that from the evolutionary standpoint the mental progress of these races
has not kept pace with their physical evolution from the plane of the
savage animal to that of the savage human.
This brings us to the crux of my contentions regarding conscious
guidance and control in its widest meaning, that is, as a universal.
Wherever we find the domination of subconscious (instinctive) control,
it affords proof that in the lowly-evolved states of life the physical
is the great controlling force, and we are well aware that this
condition does not ensure progress to those higher planes of evolution
which should be the goal of civilised growth and development, the goal
for which mankind was undoubtedly destined.
The inadequate relative progress of the mental evolution of the black
races as compared with that of their physical evolution, when considered
in relation to their approximation to the savage animals, cannot be
considered other than a most disappointing result. It surely does not
furnish any convincing evidence that mankind is likely to advance
adequately on the evolutionary plane in civilisation by continuing to
rely upon the original subconscious guidance and control.
VI
HABITS OF THOUGHT AND OF BODY
“The man who has so far made up his mind about anything that he can no
longer reckon freely with that thing, is mad where that thing is
concerned.”—ALLEN UPWARD, _The New Word_.
When speaking of the case of stammering, cited in my last chapter, I had
occasion to note that it was not an easy task to influence X’s conscious
mind. The point is this: A patient who submits himself for treatment,
whether to a medical man or to any other practitioner, may DO what he is
told, but will not or cannot THINK as he is told. In ordinary practice
the man who has taken a medical degree disregards this mental attitude
in ninety-nine cases out of a hundred. Medicine, diet, or exercise is
prescribed, and if the patient obediently follows the mechanical
directions given with regard to the prescriptions, he is considered a
good patient. The doctor does not trouble as to the patient’s attitude
of mind, except in that one case out of a hundred, possibly a case of
flagrant hypochondria.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account