Man's supreme inheritance : $b Conscious guidance and control in relation to human evolution in civilization — John Shaqi
Man's supreme inheritance : $b Conscious guidance and control in relation to human evolution in civilizationAlexander, F. Matthias (Frederick Matthias)
Science
Man's supreme inheritance : $b Conscious guidance and control in relation to human evolution in civilization
conscious control.
I believe I have at last laid myself quite open to the attack of the
habitual objector, a person I am really anxious to conciliate. I have
given him the opportunity of pointing a finger at my last paragraph and
saying, “But you only want to change one habit for another! If, as you
have implied, the habit of mind is bad, why encourage habits at all,
even if they are as you say, ‘correct and beneficial’?”
Now this is a point of the first importance. But in the first place it
is essential to understand the difference between the habit that is
recognised and understood and the habit that is not. The difference in
its application to the present case is that the first can be altered at
will and the second cannot. For when real conscious control has been
obtained a “habit” need never become fixed. It is not truly a habit at
all, but an order or series of orders given to the subordinate controls
of the body, which orders will be carried out until countermanded.
It will be understood, therefore, that the word “habit” as generally
understood, does not apply to the new discipline which it is my aim to
establish in the ordinary subconscious realms of our being. The reasons
for this are two:
(1) The conscious, intelligently realised, guiding orders are such as
may be continued for all time, becoming more effective year by year
until they are established as the real and fundamental guidance and
control necessary to that which we understand by the words growth and
evolution.
(2) The stimuli to apprehension, or excitement of the fear reflexes,
are eliminated by a procedure which teaches the pupil to take no
thought of whether what he calls “practice,” is _right or wrong_.
This second statement, however, requires further elucidation; and I feel
that a lay description by a pupil of mine may present the case more
clearly to the untrained reader than any technical account. The excerpt
is from a letter written by the Rev. W. Pennyman, M.A.
“One great feature of Mr. Alexander’s system as seen in practical use
is that the individual loses every suggestion of _strain_. He becomes
perfectly ‘lissom’ in body; all strains and tensions disappear, and
his body works like an oiled machine. Moreover, his system has a
reflex result upon the mind of the patient, and a general condition of
buoyancy and freedom, and indeed of gaiety of spirit takes the place
of the old jaded mental position. It is the pouring in of new wine,
but the bottles must also be new or they will burst, and this is
exactly what Mr. Alexander’s treatment does. It creates the new
bottles, and then the new wine can be poured in, freely and fully.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account