Manners and Monuments of Prehistoric PeoplesNadaillac, Jean-François-Albert du Pouget, marquis de
History
Manners and Monuments of Prehistoric Peoples
Nadaillac, Jean-François-Albert du Pouget, marquis de
Archaeology; Prehistoric peoples
The Vedas show us Indra, armed with a wooden club, seizing a stone with
which to pierce Vritra, the genius of evil.1 Does not this call up a
picture of the earliest days of man upon the earth? His first weapon
was doubtless a knotty branch torn from a tree as be hurried past, or a
stone picked up from amongst those lying at his feet. These were,
however, but feeble means with which to contend with formidable feline
and pachydermatous enemies. Man bad not their great physical strength;
he was not so fleet a runner as many of them; his nails and teeth were
useless to him, either for attack or defence; his smooth skin was not
enough protection even from the rigor of the climate. Such inequality
must very quickly have led to the defeat of man, had not God given to
him two marvellous instruments: the brain which conceives, and the hand
which executes. To brute force man opposed intelligence, a glorious
struggle in which he was sure to come off victorious, for in the words
of Victor Hugo, “Ceci devait tuer cela.” The huge animals of Quaternary
times have disappeared for ever, whilst plan has survived, victor over
Nature herself. Even before his birth, an immutable decree had ordained
that nothing on the earth should check his development.
Man alone amongst the countless creatures around him knew anything of
the past, and he alone was able to predict the future. Even apes,
however great the intelligence that may be attributed to them, have
remained very much what they were from the first. In vain has one
generation succeeded another; they still obey the dictates of their
brutal instincts, as their ancestors did before them; and if apes
continue to propagate their species thousands of years hence they will
remain what we see them to be now. Dogs, too, will remain dogs,
elephants will continue to be elephants; beavers will make their dams
exactly like those of the present day, wasps will never learn to make
honey as bees do, and bees will never be able, like ants, to bring up
plant-lice to be their servants, or to enslave other families. Their
instincts are incapable of progress, and in their earliest efforts they
reach the limit assigned to them by the Eternal Wisdom. To man alone
has it been given to understand what has been done by his predecessors,
to walk more firmly in the path along which they groped, to pronounce
clearly the words they stammered. Without a doubt we descend from the
men who lived in the midst of primeval forests, or amongst stagnant
marshes, dwelling in caves, for the possession of which they often bad
to fight with the wild beasts around them. These men, however, knew
that one result achieved would lead to another, if similar means were
used; they saw that a pointed stone would inflict a deeper wound than a
blunt one on the animal they hunted, and therefore they learnt to
sharpen stones artificially; the skins of beasts, flung over their
shoulders, protected them from cold, and they learned to make garments;
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account