Proust, Marcel, 1871-1922 -- Criticism and interpretation
In reply to a letter in which, expressing my disappointment at not
seeing him on a certain occasion, I went on to say that, much as I
loved his books, I would rather see him and hear him talk than read
them, he wrote me:
Entre ce qu’une personne dit et ce qu’elle extrait par la
méditation des profondeurs où l’esprit nu gît, couvert de
voiles, il y a un monde. Il est vrai qu’il y a des gens
supérieurs à leurs livres mais c’est que leurs livres ne
sont pas des _Livres_. Il me semble que Ruskin, qui
disait de temps en temps des choses sensées, a assez bien
exprimé une partie au moins de cela.... Si vous ne lisez
pas mon livre ce n’est pas ma faute; c’est la faute de mon
livre, car s’il était vraiment un beau livre il ferait
aussitôt l’unité dans les esprits épars et rendrait le
calme aux cœurs troubles.
His immersion in the subject of conversation or inquiry was complete;
nothing else existed until he had got to the bottom of it. But his
world was echoless; the voice never repeated itself, and banality could
not enter in, because neither formula nor classification existed for
him. Just as in his eyes one particular water-lily in the Vivonne was
different from any other water-lily, so each fresh experience was an
isolated unit complete in itself and unlike all other units in the
world of his consciousness. His mind, so far from being overlaid by
obliterating layers of experience, was as a virgin soil which by some
magic renews itself after each fresh crop has been harvested. This
power of mental renewal pervades and gives a peculiar freshness to all
that he has written. It is in essence a youthful quality which was very
marked in his personality. He was penetrated with boyish eagerness and
curiosity, asked endless questions, wanted always to know more. What
had you heard, what did you think, what did they say or do, whatever
_it_ was and whoever _they_ were. And there was no denying
him this or anything he wanted; he must always have his way—he always
did have it, till the end of his life. And the great comfort to those
who loved him is that till the last he was a glorious spoilt child. As
Céleste says in _Sodome_:
On devrait bien tirer son portrait en ce moment. Il a tout
des enfants. Vous ne vieillirez jamais. Vous avez de la
chance, vous n’aurez jamais à lever la main sur personne,
car vous avez des yeux qui savent imposer leur volonté....
This was the same Céleste who devoted her life to his service
for many years and was with him to the last. After his death she
wrote of him: “Monsieur ne ressemblait à personne. C’était un être
incomparable—composé de deux choses, intelligence et cœur—et quel cœur!”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account