American fiction -- 19th century; London (England) -- Fiction
Mosscrop chuckled. “Oh, but you must make allowances for the period. It
was the Renaissance, the joyful, exuberant, devil-may-care Renaissance.
If once you catch the inner spirit of it, you will feel that it was
the most glorious of periods. And Francis the First was the living,
breathing type of it. There was a man for you! He celebrated _his_
birthday all the year round. And in this particular instance, why, I
daresay it was the Duchess’s birthday too. I should have thought you
would take a more lenient view of such a pleasing double anniversary.”
Vestalia looked doubtfully at him. “I hope you don’t mean that _I_ am in
my cups, as you call it,” she said.
He laughed her suspicion down. “No, I won’t let you hint at such an
absurd thing. My dear friend, I must cultivate your sense of humour. The
roots exist, but the growth is choked by the weeds of Lambeth--or was it
Kennington? We must have them up.”
“But I don’t know _when_ you are joking,” she protested. “Besides, I
always understood that the Scotch were not a joking people.”
“Ah, you confuse two things. It is said of us, with some justice, that
we are slow to comprehend the jokes of others. But of the making of
jokes by ourselves there is no end. And--ah, here is Nero. I love Nero!”
“Is that a joke, too?”
“Ah, no,” he answered, more seriously. “It is in my nature to love all
the people whom history has picked out to condemn. If you knew the sort
of creatures who wrote the histories--the old chronicles and records
and so on--you would understand my point of view. They were full of
all meannesses and narrow bigotries; they calumniated everybody they
couldn’t blackmail. Take the case of Richard Lionheart and his brother
John, in your own English history. The former was a ferocious and
turbulent blackguard, who neglected all his duties of kingship without
shame, plundered his own subjects by torture and rapine, and was
altogether a curse to his own people and everybody else. The mere trick
of his having a taste for songs and music saved him. He buttered up the
bards, and they fastened him in history as a hero. It is precisely
the same thing that is done now by politicians who take pains to
make friends with the newspapers. On the other hand, John was a model
monarch, diligent, hardworking, extraordinarily attentive to his duties,
travelling for ever up and down the country to hold courts of justice,
and right the wrongs poor people suffered at the hands of the barons and
the abbots and other powerful ruffians. It is plain enough that the poor
people loved him; after all these centuries his name continues to be
the most popular baptismal name among them. But the bards and monkish
chroniclers were in the pay of the barons and abbots, and they paint
John for us as the most evil scoundrel in English history. That’s the
way it has always been done. I should like to have Nero’s side of his
story. I know he must have been a splendid fellow, to have got the
historians so violently against him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account