Knowing that the Floscules live in transparent gelatinous tubes, such an
object was carefully looked for, but in this instance, as is not
uncommon, it was perfectly free from extraneous matter, and possessed
nearly the same refractive power as the water, so that displaying it to
advantage required some little trouble in the way of careful focusing,
and many experiments as to the best angle at which the mirror should be
turned to direct the light. When all was accomplished, it was seen that
the Floscule had her abode in a clear transparent cylinder, like a thin
confectioner's jar, which she did not touch except at the bottom, to
which her foot was attached. Lying aside her in the bottle were three
large eggs, and the slightest shock given to the table, induced her to
draw back in evident alarm. Immediately afterwards she slowly protruded
a dense bunch of the fine long hairs, which quivered in the light, and
shone with a delicate bluish-green lustre, here and there varied by
opaline tints.
The hairs were thrust out in a mass, somewhat after the mode in which
the old-fashioned telescope hearth-brooms were made to put forth their
bristles. As soon as they were completely everted, together with the
upper portion of the Floscule, six lobes gradually separated, causing
the hairs to fall on all sides in a graceful shower, and when the
process was complete, they remained perfectly motionless, in six hollow
fan-shaped tufts, one being attached to each lobe. Some internal ciliary
action, quite distinct from the hairs, and which has never been
precisely understood, caused gentle currents to flow towards the mouth
in the middle of the lobes, and from the motion of the gizzard,
imperfectly seen through the integument, and from the rapid filling of
the stomach with particles of all hues, it was plain that captivity had
not destroyed the Floscule's appetite, and that the drop of water in the
live-box contained a good supply of food.
Sometimes the particles swallowed were too small to be discerned,
although their aggregate effect was visible; but often a monad or larger
object was ingulfed, but without any ciliary action being visible to
account for the journey they were evidently compelled to perform. The
long hairs took no part whatever in the foraging process, and as they do
not either provide victuals or minister to locomotion, they are clearly
not, as was supposed by early observers, representatives of the
"wheels," which the ordinary Rotifers present. Neither can the
cylindrical jar or bottle be justly deemed to occupy the position of the
lorica, or carapace which we have before described. The general
structure of the creature and the nature of its gizzard distinctly
marked it out as a member of the family we call "Rotifers," but the
absence of anything like "wheels" proves that those organs are not
essential characteristics of this class.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account