Mechanics: The Science of MachineryBond, A. Russell (Alexander Russell)
History
Mechanics: The Science of Machinery
Bond, A. Russell (Alexander Russell)
Machinery; Mechanical engineering; Mechanics
Following the milling machine, came the grinder, in which a revolving
wheel of an abrasive material served to wear away the surface of a
piece of work, and with this form of machine steels of great hardness
could be finished with accuracy and a high polish.
THE INTERCHANGEABLE SYSTEM
The most notable advance in machine work came early in the nineteenth
century, when what was known as the “American System” of manufacture,
or the interchangeable system, was introduced. As long as mechanics
were obliged to perform their operations largely by hand, it was
impossible to attain great accuracy. Each workman put his own
individuality into the work. As a consequence, no two pieces were of
exactly the same size or shape. This was true even with the early
power-driven machine tools. The parts might be very close to the same
size, but careful measurements showed that they varied by a minute
fraction of an inch. Hence, when a machine was assembled the unyielding
metal parts had to be filed and trimmed and hammered to fit them
together. If any accident occurred to a machine, the damaged part
could not be replaced by another taken from stock. The entire machine
had to go back to the shop where an experienced mechanic would make a
new part to replace the damaged one. In those days a machine was not
manufactured but was built as an individual mechanism, just as a house
or a boat is built to-day.
With the advent of accurate machine tools came the idea of
standardizing the parts so that hundreds and thousands of pieces could
be made of exactly the same dimensions, and in assembling a machine
the parts could be picked at random from the stock and put together
without the use of special tools and without requiring any special
fitting. This was of special importance in the tools of warfare,
because armies need quantity production, i. e., rifles, cannon, etc.
More machines of the same kind were required for an army than for any
other organization or line of work. At the close of the Napoleonic
War the British Government had 200,000 parts of muskets either partly
finished or waiting repairs. Their muskets were made after the old
system. Each one was built separately with its parts individually
fitted together, so that whenever any part was injured, the musket had
to be laid aside and sent back to the workshop for repairs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account