Medea, consort of Aegeus, King of Athens (Mythological character) -- Drama
P. 9, l. 131, CHORUS.]--As Dr. Verrall has remarked, the presence of the
Chorus is in this play unusually awkward from the dramatic point of
view. Medea's plot demands most absolute secrecy; and it is incredible
that fifteen Corinthian women, simply because they were women, should
allow a half-mad foreigner to murder several people, including their
own Corinthian king and princess--who was a woman also--rather than
reveal her plot. We must remember in palliation (1) that these women
belong to the faction in Corinth which was friendly to Medea and hostile
to Creon; (2) that the appeal to them as women had more force in
antiquity than it would now, and the princess had really turned traitor
to her sex. (See note on this subject at the end of the present writer's
translation of the _Electra_.) (3) The non-interference of the Chorus
seems monstrous: yet in ancient times, when law was weak and punishment
was chiefly the concern of the injured persons, and of no one else, the
reluctance of bystanders to interfere was much greater than it is now in
an ordered society. Some oriental countries, and perhaps even California
or Texas, could afford us some startling instances of impassiveness
among bystanders.
P. 12, l. 167, Oh, wild words!]--The Nurse breaks in, hoping to drown
her mistress's dangerous self-betrayal. Medea's murder of her brother
(see Introduction, p. vi) was by ordinary standards her worst act, and
seems not to have been known in Corinth. It forms the climax of Jason's
denunciation, l. 1334, p. 74.
P. 13, l. 190, Alas, the brave blithe bards, &c.]--Who is the speaker?
According to the MSS. the Nurse, and there is some difficulty in taking
the lines from her. Yet (1) she has no reason to sing a song outside
after saying that she is going in; and (2) it is quite necessary that
she should take a little time indoors persuading Medea to come out. The
words seem to suit the lips of an impersonal Chorus.
The general sense of the poem is interesting. It is an apology for
tragedy. It gives the tragic poet's conception of the place of his art
in the service of humanity, as against the usual feeling of the public,
whose serious work is devoted to something else, and who "go to a play
to be amused."
P. 14, l. 214, Women of Corinth, I am come, &c.]--These opening lines
are a well-known _crux interpretum_. It is interesting to note, (1) that
the Roman poet Ennius (ca. 200 B.C.) who translated the _Medea_, did not
understand them in the least; while, on the other hand, the earliest
Greek commentators seem not to have noticed that there was any
difficulty in them worth commenting upon. That implies that while the
acting tradition was alive and unbroken, the lines were easily
understood; but when once the tradition failed, the meaning was lost.
(The first commentator who deals with the passage is Irenaeus, a scholar
of the Augustan time.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account