Medical symbolism in connection with historical studies in the arts of healing and hygieneSozinskey, Thomas S.
History
Medical symbolism in connection with historical studies in the arts of healing and hygiene
Sozinskey, Thomas S.
Symbolism in medicine
As I have already intimated, the god of medicine—that is,
Æsculapius[9]—was not only on familiar terms, so to speak, with the
serpent, but at times given a serpentine form. Pausanias expressly
informs us that he often appeared in such singular shape.[10] The visitor
to imperial Rome about two thousand years ago saw this divinity in
reptilian guise an object of high regard and worship. It is worth while
to enter into a short study of the matter.
Now, at the outset, I may observe that it is a noteworthy fact that in
their regard for medical men the early Greeks and others contrasted
remarkably with the Romans. The Greeks would seem to have duly prized
the class. One has but to turn to Homer to find evidence of the fact. A
passage suggested by Machaon’s splendid exercise of his beneficent art,
spoken by Idomeneus when the “offspring of the healing god” was wounded
by a dart fired by “the spouse of Helen” (Paris), and “trembling Greece
for her physician fear’d,” runs:—
“A wise physician skill’d our wounds to heal,
Is more than armies to the public weal.”[11]
Cowper translates this interesting couplet more literally than Pope:—
“One so skill’d in medicine and to free
The inherent barb is worth a multitude.”
This is a very noble tribute to the physician; in fact, I know of but few
as good, among them being the one in “Ecclesiasticus” which reads: “The
skill of the physician shall lift up his head and in the sight of great
men he shall be praised.”[12] The latter is Hebræo-Egyptian in origin,
and its date is about two hundred years before our era. The early Romans
did not look on doctors with any such favor.[13]
It is a well-known fact that the art of medicine was never very
enthusiastically or successfully cultivated by the Romans. It was not
until a comparatively late date that medical practitioners existed
among them at all. Pliny has left us some interesting notes on the
matter. After the statement that many nations have gotten along without
physicians, he says: “Such, for instance, was the Roman people for a
period of more than six hundred years; a people, too, which has never
shown itself slow to adopt all useful arts, and which even welcomed the
medical art with avidity until, after a fair experience of it, there was
found good reason to condemn it.”[14] He himself was not a great friend
of it.
Cato, who died in the year of the city of Rome 605, said,
authoritatively: “They (the Greeks) have conspired among themselves
to murder all barbarians with their medicine, a profession which they
exercise for lucre, in order that they may win our confidence and
despatch us all the more easily. I forbid you to have anything to do with
physicians.”[15] Notwithstanding this, the imperious old Roman had not
a personal dislike to taking medicine; “far from it, by Hercules,” says
Pliny, “for he subjoins an account of the medical prescriptions by the
aid of which he had ensured to himself and his wife a ripe old age.”[16]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account