[28] _Declinatio_ is the eighth item, under Priscian, in the list from Thierry’s _Heptateuchon_ cited above, page 153. [29] For _clausula_ see the indexes to ARP and to this volume; for John’s own cadences, below, Chapter VIII. [30] Œconomia. [31] See below, page 170. [32] For _inventio_ and _iudicium_ see Hugh above, page 154, and note 16. Quintilian III. iii. 5 objects to the application of this to rhetoric. [33] See Hugh’s division above, page 155. [34] Vocum et intellectuum. [35] Ficta, hypothetical? Sophistica seems to be intended in the following clause. [36] Thesis. [37] Reading _aliarum_. [38] This is pointed out by Colson in his edition of Quintilian’s first book, Cambridge, 1924, page 1, note 2. It is the stranger that the quotations should not have been noticed before since John himself calls attention to them: “ut verbo utamur Quintiliani,” “ab auctoritate ejusdem Quintiliani” (I. xxiv. 853 D). [39] _Illustratio_ in I. xxiv (854 A/B) is probably a reminiscence of Quintilian VI. ii. 32, to judge not only from the word, but from the context in both passages. Cf. 844 A, 851 C, 860 C, 910 D. [40] Alanus de Insulis (about 1128-1202), Cistercian at Citeaux, sometimes called “doctor universalis,” wrote mainly on theology. _Anticlaudianus_ was edited by Wright in the second volume of his _Anglo-Latin Satirical Poets and Epigrammatists of the Twelfth Century_, London, (Rolls Series), which contains also _De planctu naturæ_. The latter has been translated by D. M. Moffat in Yale Studies in English, New York, 1908. The citations in this section are by column from PL 210. For the _Summa de arte predicatoria_ see below, Chapter IX. C. [41] See above, Chapter III. B. 1. [42] For Hugh, see above, page 153. [43] Alain’s order is the usual (1) _grammatica_, (2) _dialectica_, (3) _rhetorica_. His _logica_ is _dialectica_, not the inclusive term of Hugh and John. Its _auctores_ (III. ii. 510 A) are Porphyry, Aristotle, Zeno, Boethius. [44] III. ii. 512-513. [45] About 1190-1264. The _Speculum_ was printed at Strasburg in 1473, and by the Benedictines at Douai in 1624. [46] Book III (II in the Benedictine edition). [47] Book IV (III in the Benedictine edition). [48] Vincent refers in Chapter 100 to Quintilian. “Tullius in libro de oratore” (100 and 127) is probably not a reference to _De oratore_. In 101 “Tullius in rhetorica prima,” and in 127 “idem in rhetorica secunda,” are the usual references to _De inventione_ and _ad Herennium_. For the references to Quintilian see Bassi, _Giornale storico_, XXIII, 186, and Colson’s introduction to his edition of Quintilian’s first book, page lii. [49] Farabi. For translations from Arabic see above, page 153, and Haskins, Chapter IX. [50] Compare Alain above in the quotation on page 174. [51] For the three school exercises that conclude this list see the indexes to ARP and to this volume; for the rest of the classification, Bede, above, Chapter V. B. 1.