Medieval rhetoric and poetic to 1400 : $b Interpreted from representative worksBaldwin, Charles Sears
History
Medieval rhetoric and poetic to 1400 : $b Interpreted from representative works
Baldwin, Charles Sears
Literature, Medieval -- History and criticism; Poetics -- History -- To 1500; Rhetoric, Medieval
But an uninformed modern reader of Book IV would hardly be aware that
sophistic existed. No denunciation could be more scathing than this
silence. In Augustine’s view of Christian preaching sophistic simply has
no place. A good debater, instead of parrying he counters. He spends his
time on his own case. A good teacher, he tells his neophytes not what to
avoid, but what to do. He has so far renounced sophistic that he has no
concern to triumph. He wishes simply to teach sound rhetorical doctrine.
He achieves an extraordinary conciseness not so much by compression as by
undeviating straightforwardness.
A reader familiar with the times, however, will be reminded of sophistic
by many allusions. Single phrases or sentences some of them, a few more
extended, they all serve to illuminate by contrast the true rhetoric.
All these things, when they are taught by rhetors, are thought
great, bought at a great price, sold with great boasting. Such
boasting, I fear, I may suggest myself in speaking so; but I
had to answer those ill-educated men who think that our authors
are to be despised, not because they lack the eloquence which
such critics love too much, but because they do not use it for
display. vii.
[But an audience of Christian sobriety] will not be pleased
with that suave style in which though no wrong things are
said, right things slight and frail are adorned with foamy
circumlocution. xiv.
I think I have accomplished something not when I hear them
applauding, but when I see them weeping. xxiv.[5]
Display, inflation, thirst for applause—every reader of Augustine’s time
would recognize in these allusions a repudiation of sophistic.
For Augustine thinks that Christian preaching is to be learned best
from Christian preachers. As if in reply to Julian’s scornful “Let
them elucidate their Matthew and Luke,”[6] he recommends not only for
doctrine, but for rhetoric, the Epistles, the Prophets, and the Fathers,
and proceeds to analyze their style. The analysis, though based on the
current Latin version, is generally transferable to the Greek, since
it is much simpler than the classification set forth by sophistic. It
exhibits sentence movement simply in climax, period, balance—those
devices which are most easily appropriated and most useful. The general
ancient counsels of aptness and variety are applied specifically to
preaching. As to cadence (_clausula_), Augustine dispenses with all
subdivisions, and even makes bold to assert that it must sometimes be
sacrificed. Similarly omitting all classification of figures, he manages
to suggest in a few words what figures are for. In a word, he shows how
to learn from the Canon and the Fathers the rhetoric that is vital to
homiletic.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account