Memoirs of the life of David Rittenhouse, LLD. F.R.S., late president of the American Philosophical Society, &c. : $b interspersed with various notices of many distinguished men : with an appendix, containing sundry philosophical and other papers, most of which have not hitherto been publishedBarton, William
History
Memoirs of the life of David Rittenhouse, LLD. F.R.S., late president of the American Philosophical Society, &c. : $b interspersed with various notices of many distinguished men : with an appendix, containing sundry philosophical and other papers, most of which have not hitherto been published
The Abbé le Blanc (or the writer who assumed that appellation) names,
of this metaphysical tribe, Hobbes, Lord Shaftesbury, Tindal and
Collins, all Englishmen; though his own country has long been the
superlatively prolific soil of infidelity in religion, and chimerical
theories in every department of science: such philosophers abound in
France. He observes very justly, however, that “there is nothing so
improperly made use of, as the name philosopher.” See _Le Blanc’s
Letters on the English and French Nations_.
-----
This is certainly correct, in one point of view; although the assertion
seems to imply a contradiction in terms, so far as it applies to the
metaphysical scepticism of many, assuming the honourable appellation of
Philosophers, without being entitled to the true character. What were
the sentiments of Dr. Rittenhouse, concerning the tenets of men of this
description, may be fairly inferred, not only from the manner in which
he has introduced the names of Berkeley and Hume into the Oration which
he pronounced before the Philosophical Society, in the year 1775, but
from other observations and reflexions contained in that discourse, as
well as from the general tenure of opinions expressed by him on various
occasions.
At an early period of the French revolution, a circumstance occurred,
which, from its connexion in some particulars with the life of our
Philosopher, is here entitled to notice.
On the 7th of August 1783, and after peace had been proclaimed, congress
unanimously passed a resolution in the following words——“Resolved, That
an equestrian statue of General Washington be erected at the place where
the residence of Congress shall be established;—that the statue be of
bronze: the General to be represented in a Roman dress, holding a
truncheon in his right hand, and his head, encircled with a laurel
wreath. The Statue to be supported by a marble pedestal, on which are to
be represented, in _basso relievo_, the following principal events of
the war, in which General Washington commanded in person: the evacuation
of Boston;—the capture of the Hessions, at Trenton;—the battle of
Princeton;—the action of Monmouth;—and the surrender of York.—On the
upper part of the front of the pedestal, to be engraved as follows: “The
United States in Congress assembled ordered this Statue to be erected,
in the year of our Lord 1783, in honour of GEORGE WASHINGTON, the
illustrious Commander in Chief of the Armies of the United States of
America, during the war which vindicated and secured their Liberty,
Sovereignty and Independence.”[281]
-----
Footnote 281:
The legislature of Virginia, in their first session after the
resignation of the Commander in Chief, passed the following
resolution:—
“Resolved, that the executive be requested to take measures for
procuring a Statue of General Washington, to be of the finest marble
and best workmanship, with the following inscription on its pedestal.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account