Derbyshire (England) -- Antiquities; Derbyshire (England) -- History
So far as can be judged from the usually worn down and mutilated
condition of these Derbyshire barrows, the prevailing original form
was that of a shallow dome or inverted bowl, but various transitions
ending with the disc-shaped types of Dr. Thurnam occur. Their outlines
are circular, unless rendered irregular by the addition of secondary
mounds or the depredations of a still later age. Their usual diameters
range between 30 and 60 feet, and the heights rarely exceed 6 feet; but
these dimensions are occasionally less or greater. With few exceptions,
the mounds are of stone, or of stone with an admixture of earth; but
whether the latter is an original ingredient is often uncertain—it may
be merely blown earth and vegetable mould. Broadly speaking, therefore,
these Bronze Age barrows are cairns. In most instances they consist
of such stones as may be gathered from the surface, simply thrown
together. A slight advance upon this is the introduction of a kerb of
larger stones to define the margin of the mound (fig. 6). In a further
advance, the kerb is formed of one or more rings of large, flat stones
set on edge in the ground and inclining inwards. In a still further
advance, the whole mound may be built up of concentric rings of such
inclined stones. The barrow on Grinlow[9] (on which the tower known
as “Solomon’s Temple” stands), near Buxton, showed this construction
(fig. 7). In the kerbed barrows, the partial removal of the looser
materials of the central portion may result in a table-like mound, the
kerb forming a well-marked shoulder; and if the destructive process has
gone further, this may stand out verge-like—results which have been
mistaken for original designs. Examples of all these are to be met with
in Derbyshire.
[9] _Proceedings_, Society of Antiquaries, 1895.
These barrows, again, are sometimes surrounded with a bank or a ring of
stones, or a combination of the two. That known as Hob Hurst’s House,
on Baslow Moor,[10] is closely invested with an annular bank, and the
writer has seen a similar example on Eyam Moor. In others, the bank is
further away, and is usually capped or lined with a row of standing
stones, a few feet or yards apart. There was formerly a good example
of this variety on Abney Moor, and others on Eyam Moor with rings
apparently of stones only. As the ring expanded, the enclosed mound
seems to have been smaller, and consequently more easily removed by the
accidents of time; and this probably explains the origin of the smaller
so-called “Druidical” circles.[11]
[10] _Ten Years’ Diggings_, 87.
[11] See article, “Early Man,” _Victoria History_, Derbyshire.
[Illustration: Fig. 6.—Section of Barrow at Flaxdale, near Youlgreave.
(_From wood-cut by Llewellynn Jewitt_.)]
[Illustration: Fig. 7.—Section of Barrow at Grinlow, near Buxton.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account