Derbyshire (England) -- Antiquities; Derbyshire (England) -- History
Before the food-vase ran its course, cremation, in the proper sense of
the term, made its appearance, and soon became the general fashion.
Perhaps it would be going too far to say that it _supplanted_
inhumation. For anything we know to the contrary, the latter still
continued in vogue in some parts of the country to the Roman period.
At first, it would seem, the cremated remains were deposited in cists,
or otherwise entombed after the manner of unburnt bodies; but soon
the more appropriate cinerary urn made its appearance, as also the
changeful and enigmatical little incense-cup. That the cinerary urn
was derived from the food-vase is almost beyond doubt, for although
Derbyshire has not supplied examples bridging the two, vessels of
intermediate form and associated with burnt remains, but not containing
them, have been found in the north.
Meanwhile, the objects placed with the dead became fewer and more
meagre in character, until at length they were reduced to little more
than fragments of flint, representing a rite, perhaps, with a lost
meaning. Less care was expended on the sepulchral vessels as time went
on, but the delicacy of some of the incense-cups proves that this was a
rule with exceptions. The general trend of evidence goes to show that
the later mounds raised over the dead were smaller and less stereotyped
in form than those of old. Ringed barrows and the smaller “circles”
are associated with cremated interments, especially those of the
cinerary-urn stage, in Derbyshire.
“Late” Prehistoric Barrows.
The interval between the last barrows and the Roman period presents
many difficulties to the student of the ancient sepulchral remains
of Derbyshire. A few—barely two dozen—barrows have been opened in
the county which had certain features in common that markedly
differentiated them from those of the Bronze Age on the one hand and
from the post-Roman or Anglo-Saxon on the other. Some of these, perhaps
most, can certainly be assigned to this interval; and of the rest,
several seem to as conclusively belong to the Roman period. As these
differ much from the typical Romano-British barrows, they may be held
to prove that the Romanization of the natives of the district was a
slow and retarded process. From the extremely ruined condition of these
barrows and their usually meagre contents it is only by comparing them
together, and especially with the larger number of the same type in
the adjacent parts of Staffordshire, that anything conclusive can be
learned of their original characteristics.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account