Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
The consideration of what may be called the mythical period of Mexican
history is rendered all the more difficult by the fact that all the
legends have been collected among later immigrants who wished as
far as possible to trace some connection between themselves and the
earlier settlers. Toltec descent, if it could be established, raised a
family at once to a patrician status, and most of the immigrant tribes
sought their rulers among the descendants of a Toltec house. There is
therefore the danger of fictitious genealogies, such as exist among
so many Sudanese tribes desirous of proving “Arab” descent; but apart
from this we are confronted at the outset with a difficulty which is
not easy of solution. Sahagun states that the first inhabitants, the
Toltec, the other Nahua, the Olmec and the Michoacans, arrived at the
Panuco valley and worked down the east coast before turning inland.
Ixtlilxochitl represents the Toltec as coasting down lower California
and Jalisco. Of the two writers Sahagun is by far the more trustworthy,
but at the same time it is difficult to see what Ixtlilxochitl had to
gain by deliberately transferring the scene of the migration from one
coast to the other. The story of Sahagun is, in brief, as follows. The
migrants penetrated as far as Guatemala, and then settled for a time
at a place called Tamoanchan, mention of which occurs in nearly all
migration legends. Here the wise men who led them departed, taking
the god under whose guidance they travelled and the picture-writings
which contained their lore, and sailing eastward over the sea. The
rest remained behind, under the governance of certain lesser sages, of
whom the chief were Oxomoco and Cipactonal, “awaiting the dawn for the
administration of society.” The Olmec also split from the main stem
at this point. From here the others went to Xomiltepec, and then to
Teotihuacan, a site remarkable for extensive pre-Aztec ruins, where
they elected rulers, and then to Coatepec, where the Otomi branched
off. Later the tribes who still remained associated foregathered at
Chicomoztoc, another locality mentioned in nearly all the myths, where
they established cave-temples. Hence the Toltec departed to Tulanzinco,
and subsequently to Tulan; after they had separated, the Tarascans
also split off, finding their way to Michoacan. Later still the
Nahua, including the Tepanec (founders of Azcapotzalco), the Acolhua
(of Tezcoco), and the eventual populations of Chalco, Uexotzinco and
Tlaxcala respectively. The Aztec alone remained wandering in the
northern steppes until they too eventually reached the valley of
Mexico. It is hardly worth while entering into the details of Toltec
history as recorded subsequent to their settlement; the “Annals of
Quauhtitlan,” a native tradition of considerable age and value, gives
a list of five kings; Torquemada and Ixtlilxochitl furnish an entirely
different list, the latter mentioning one king in addition to those
quoted by Torquemada.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account