Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
The early history of the Maya tribes is by no means easy to extract
from the traditions which have survived until the present day.
The chief sources of information are as follows. The traditions
relating to the Tutul-Xiu family, the centre of whose power at the
time of the conquest lay at Mani in Yucatan, which were reduced to
writing, under the name of the “Books of Chilan Balam” (Chilan Balam
meaning Tiger-priest) in Spanish times. The legends of the Quiché,
who in historical times occupied the plateau around Santa Cruz and
Quetzaltanango, with their capital at Utatlan, contained in the Popol
Vuh. The “Annals” of the Xahila family of the Kakchiquel tribe, whose
chief city was Iximché near the modern Tecpan Guatemala. Finally the
scattered traditions collected from the natives by such early writers
as Landa and Cogolludo. The Yucatec traditions alone can be brought
into any direct connection with the ruined sites of the early and
architecturally more advanced Maya culture, but all of them agree in
fixing Tulan as the starting-point of their respective migrations.
Again the Books of Chilan Balam are the only traditions which are
accompanied throughout by definite dates, according to a system which
is explained later, and these dates can be correlated with our own
time owing to the fact that each version fixes with great precision
the death of a certain Ahpula, which occurred in 1536. Unfortunately
the different versions do not agree as to the earlier dates, and in
some cases extended time-periods appear to have been interpolated.
I think however by careful comparison it is possible to reduce the
discrepancies to a minimum, and I have therefore drawn up a scheme of
chronology, based in the main on the version current at Mani, for which
some degree of accuracy may, I think, be claimed. I do not pretend that
these dates are more than tentative, but they will at least serve as
a frame-work into which the main facts of Maya history may be fitted
(Appendix III). The tradition current in Yucatan at the time of Landa
was that the country had been peopled by two sets of immigrants, one
from the east under a god or high-priest Itzamna, the other from the
west under Kukulkan (the Maya equivalent of Quetzalcoatl), who later
departed westward in the direction of Mexico. The first immigrants
are said to have built Chichen Itza, and Kukulkan is related to have
ruled there for a time, though afterwards his votaries built the city
of Mayapan, where he reigned as a sort of overlord of the Yucatec.
According to this author the Tutul-Xiu entered Yucatan from the south,
and joined the Mayapan confederacy. To judge from their own legend the
Tutul-Xiu left their original abode, Nonoual in Tulan Zuiva, about the
year 418 A.D. (though it is possible that this event may have
occurred earlier, viz. in 161, but I think the evidence is in favour
of the later dating). Their leader was Holon Chantepeuh, and their
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account