Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
first settlement was at Chacnouitan, and subsequently, under Ahmekat
Tutul-Xiu, at Balcalar. Whilst there, they heard of Chichen Itza, and
later removed to this site, about the year 496. The fact that they
are stated to have heard of Chichen Itza while they were at Balcalar
seems to prove that some settlement already existed at the former
place, and one version of the tradition represents them as setting out
in search of it. For over a century they resided at Chichen Itza, and
then removed to Champoton, probably owing to difficulties with their
neighbours, since it is stated that Chichen was “destroyed.” Their
stay at Champoton is estimated at about two centuries and a half, at
the end of which period they wandered back to Chichen Itza and again
established themselves there. Not long afterwards Uxmal was “founded”
by one of the Xiu family, Ahzuitok Tutul-Xiu, about 989, and the famous
“league” of Mayapan was formed. For some time, about two hundred years,
a central government was maintained at Mayapan, the city associated
so closely with Kukulkan, and no doubt the paramount chieftains were
satisfied with little more than the bare recognition of suzerainty.
But the centrifugal action so noticeable in the political history of
the American peoples began to assert itself, the league split up and
Mayapan fell. The exact circumstances which led to the downfall of the
paramount city are obscure. The family of the Cocomes were the rulers
of Mayapan at the time, and it would appear that they had begun to
exercise a closer control over their vassals. To support the harsher
methods which they introduced they commenced to employ the services of
mercenaries, “Mexicans,” recruited in Tabasco and Xicalanco, and by
their aid levied tribute upon the other members of the league to an
extent which the latter were not prepared to suffer. The accounts of
the Books of Chilan Balam are obscure, but they agree in the names
of the personages who played the principal parts in the events which
followed. Chac-Xib-Chac was the “Governor” of Chichen Itza, and it
would appear that he conspired against the ruler of Mayapan, Hunac
Ceel, who drove him out, according to the, no doubt, partisan account
of the Xiu house, by “treachery.” This treachery probably implies the
employment of the foreign mercenaries mentioned above, since Hunac
Ceel’s agents are called the “seven men of Mayapan,” and their names,
which are recorded, are Nahua rather than Maya. Ulil, the ruler of
Itzamal, also appears to have been implicated in the conspiracy against
the ruling house. But whatever was the exact course of events, the
net result was that Chichen Itza was depopulated about the year 1187;
meanwhile the Nahua mercenaries had influenced the ethnography of the
country by the introduction of the bow as a weapon. But the end was
not yet, the people of Chichen Itza nursed their revenge, and about a
century later instigated a general rising which resulted in the sack of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account