He then suggests as a measurer of current the standard form of
electrolytic cell ever since known as the _voltameter_. He preferred
that kind in which water is decomposed, the quantity of electricity
which had flowed through it being measured by the quantity of the
gas or gases evolved during the operation. Before adopting this he
undertook careful experiments in which his fine manipulative skill, no
less than his chemical experience, was called into service to verify
the fact that the quantity of water decomposed was really proportionate
to the quantity of electricity which has been passed through the
instrument. Having this standard, he investigated numerous other cases
of decomposition by the current, and so arrived at a substantial basis
for the doctrine of _definite electro-chemical_ action. Speaking of
the substances into which electrolytes are divided by the current,
and which he had called ions, he says: “They are combining bodies;
are directly associated with the fundamental parts of the doctrine
of chemical affinity; and have each a definite proportion, in which
they are always evolved during electrolytic action.... I have proposed
to call the numbers representing the proportions in which they are
evolved _electro-chemical equivalents_. Thus hydrogen, oxygen,
chlorine, iodine, lead, tin are _ions_; the three former are _anions_,
the two metals _cations_, and 1, 8, 36, 125, 104, 58, are their
_electro-chemical equivalents_ nearly.”
This fundamental law being set upon an impregnable basis of facts,
he goes on to speculate upon the _absolute quantity_ of electricity
or electric power belonging to different bodies; a notion which only
within the last few years has found general acceptance.
In developing this theory he uses the following language:--
According to it [_i.e._ this theory], the equivalent weights of
bodies are simply those quantities of them which contain equal
quantities of electricity, or have naturally equal electric
powers; it being the ELECTRICITY which _determines_ the
equivalent number, _because_ it determines the combining force.
Or, if we adopt the atomic theory or phraseology, then the
atoms of bodies which are equivalents to each other in their
ordinary chemical action, have equal quantities of electricity
naturally associated with them. But I must confess I am jealous
of the term _atom_....
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account