Military and religious life in the Middle Ages and at the period of the Renaissance — John Shaqi
Military and religious life in the Middle Ages and at the period of the RenaissanceJacob, P. L.
History
Military and religious life in the Middle Ages and at the period of the Renaissance
Jacob, P. L.
Europe -- Social life and customs; Manners and customs -- History; Middle Ages; Renaissance
The imperial towns--which, from the twelfth to the fourteenth century,
after having freed themselves from the fetters of feudalism, had risen
to such a height of independence that the emperor himself had but a
nominal supremacy over them--were Ratisbon, in Bavaria; Augsburg and
Ulm, in Swabia; Nuremberg, Spiers, Worms, and Frankfort-on-the-Main,
in Franconia; Magdeburg, in Saxony; Hamburg, Bremen, and Lubeck, in the
Hanseatic League; Aix-la-Chapelle, Bonn, Cologne, Coblentz, Mayence,
Strasburg, and Metz, in the Rhenish and Lotharingian provinces.
These towns, essentially industrial and commercial, in which the
middle-classes were for the most part supreme, formed vast emporiums,
teeming with the products of the north, the south, and the east. They
were looked upon as the store-houses and arsenals of Europe. Feudalism,
unable to produce anything for itself, was always replenishing from
these depôts the resources necessary for equipping and revictualling
its armies. From them came the arms and the engines of warfare, as
well as the special workmen, the cross-bowmen, the carpenters, the
founders, and the artillerymen, who composed the _personnel_
of the artillery at this period. If the free towns had arrived at a
common understanding, and formed a pacific league between themselves,
they would have presented a serious obstacle to the struggles of
the suzerain lords; but their distance from each other, especially
those in the centre of Germany, prevented them from coming to such
an arrangement. Nor could they, as in England, form an alliance with
the feudal nobility, nor, as in France, make common cause with the
suzerain. As the emperor left them to act independently, they were
obliged to organize their own defence, to contract alliances with some
powerful neighbour, and weaken, by dividing them, those enemies whom
they deemed stronger than themselves. Thus these free towns never
constituted a homogeneous body; they were isolated and spread over
a vast extent of territory, being only brought together by feelings
of interest and sympathy, but without any mutual tie or political
cohesion. The lord with whom they were at war to-day, would enter
their service and pay the next, with the title of _soldarien_;
and at times a single town would have as many as two or three hundred
of these allies, who were always followed by a swarm of marauders, and
who spread desolation throughout the land. The lords who were without
fortune, who represented the petty feudalism of the country districts,
finding in the service of these towns a means for keeping up their
state and paying their followers, passed from one to the other, and
only enlisted under the standard of a sovereign prince for want of
better employment, for the latter did not as a rule pay so well as
these free towns.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account