As such he has been subjected to very little really critical
examination.[4] The result of such as I myself have been able to give
him was arrived at somewhat slowly: or rather it flashed upon me,
after reading the poems several times over in different arrangements,
that which gives the serious and satiric pieces higgledy-piggledy as
in the older editions, and that which separates them, as in 1677 and
in Mr. Berdan's American reprint. This result is that I entertain a
very serious doubt whether Cleveland _ever_ wrote 'serious' poetry,
in one sense--he was of course serious enough in his satires--at all.
That, on the other hand, he deliberately set himself to burlesque the
'metaphysical' manner I do not think: or at least (for rather minute
definition is necessary here) I do not think that he executed this
burlesque with any reforming intention or any particular contempt for
the style. Like Butler, whom he in so many ways resembles--who pretty
certainly owed him not a little, and of whom he was, as has often been
pointed out, a sort of rough copy or spoiled draft--he was what he
satirized in the literary way, and he caricatured himself. Of course
if anybody thinks, as the _Retrospective_ Reviewer thought, that
'Fuscara' and 'To the State of Love' are actually and intrinsically
'beautiful specimens of poetic conception', he will scout my notion.
But I do not think that any one who has done me the honour even to
look into these volumes will think me an 'antimetaphysical', and
I must confess that I can see only occasional poetry here--only a
caricature of such methods as may be suggested by Donne's 'Bracelet'
piece, and the best things in Crashaw. It is, for instance, a very
tell-tale thing that there is not, in Cleveland's work, a single one
of the lovely lyrics that enshrine and ennoble the conceits in almost
every one else of the school, from Donne himself to Sherburne.
An American critic, defending Cleveland with the delightful
indiscreetness of most defenders, maintains that these lyrics were
failures--that they were _not_ characteristic of the time. Well, let
us be thankful that almost everybody down to Kynaston and John Hall
'failed' in this way not seldom.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account