but it cannot generate; for it is fruitful of controversies, but barren
of works” (13: p. 54). Turn your eyes from the antiquated record of
the past to the infinite reality of living nature. The key to open
its secret is in your hands. The sphere of conquest here is vast and
inexhaustible; its pleasure is noble and insatiable. Thus rings out
the scientific Sermon on the Mount. The real goal is shown, a broad new
highway opened; science being vitalized by reunion with the infinite
reality of living nature and the ever-progressive life of humanity
marches to her never-ending conquest. Knowledge rescued from the depths
of ignominy and impotence is raised to its heavenly seat; the ideal
of omniscience, coupled with omnipotence, has ever since become the
aspiration and motive power of the modern world. Although Bacon did not
concern himself with the direct problems of education, a conception
such as the above could not but introduce a new tendency into it. If
we may call Luther the father of Protestant education, Bacon should be
called the father of scientific education, both of which, when broadly
interpreted, characterize the modern period of the Western education.
Bacon’s direct influence in the educational field naturally was to be
exercised upon the higher institutions of learning. But the admittance
of his ideas and spirit into them was a very slow and hard process.
In the “advancement of learning” he advocated the founding of a real
university, “left free to the arts and sciences at large,” devoted
entirely to the free investigation and advancement of learning, without
professional aim or any external restrictions. In the “New Atlantis,”
his ideal state, an academy of science with its museum and laboratory,
stands as the center. He also suggested a plan for the coöperation of
all European universities. But the time was not ripe for all these
ideas, nor have his visions yet been fully realized. A more immediate
effect was the inspiration which his new gospel of learning and its
principles have given to those through whom Europe first attained a
definite theory of educational purpose and art, especially Comenius and
Locke.
REFERENCES
1. +Adamson, John William.+ Pioneers of Modern
Education, 1600-1700. University Press, Cambridge, 1905. 285 pages.
2. +Bacon, Francis (Viscount St. Albans).+ The
Advancement of Learning. Third edition, and revised by W. A. Wright.
Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1885. 376 pages.
3. ---- The same. Book I, edited by Albert S. Cook. Ginn &
Co., Boston, 1904. 145 pages.
4. ---- The New Atlantis. Edited by G. C. M. Smith.
University Press, Cambridge, 1900. 72 pages.
5. +Compayré, Jules Gabriel.+ History of Pedagogy.
Translated, with an introduction, notes, and an index, by W. H. Payne.
Heath & Co., Boston, 1899. 589 pages.
6. +Davidson, Thomas.+ Aristotle and Ancient
Educational Ideals. Scribner, New York, 1897. 256 pages.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account