The conception of a flexible revelation--of one that could be
indefinitely extended, amended, expurgated, or even abrogated in
part--was excellent in many ways. Christianity and Mormonism, to cite
only two counter cases, have both suffered somewhat, perhaps, from
the inexorable nature of their scriptures. Woe unto him who alters
a jot or tittle of their contents! At the same time, the precise
meaning of the Christian creed, in particular, is very indefinite; it
permits a latitude of interpretation, even in fundamental matters,
that has brought about those lamentable schisms into major, minor
and microscopic sects with which everyone is familiar. But, however
much civil strife Islam may have endured from political factionalism
or antagonism over inconsequential tenets in the Koran, it has
remained indissolubly firm in its adherence to its supereminent
divinities: Allah and Mohammed. And the credit for this, it is
to be suspected, is due principally to the one whom all orthodox
Moslems believe--or profess they believe--to be the lesser.
Poetry and oratory--the only forms of literature known to the
Arabs--were both oracular and rudely rhythmical; and Mohammed, who
from his childhood had been familiar with the yearly contests of
poets and orators at the fairs, naturally adopted a cognate medium
of expression. His thoughts, whether conceived in a white heat of
frenzy or with deliberate coolness and sly calculation for the main
chance, were probably not written down in any definite way during
his life. It is not certain, in fact, that he could either read or
write. He delighted in the appellation “the illiterate Prophet,”
possibly on account of his humility, and possibly because he knew
that inspired ignorance had been the indisputable prerogative of
all successful prophets in the past. Indeed, the very fact that
he was unlearned was rightly supposed to increase the miraculous
nature of his revelations. As he tossed the divine emanations
from his lips, they were sometimes recorded by hired or willing
scribes upon palm leaves, leather, stones, the shoulder-blades or
ribs of camels and goats, or were even tattooed upon the breasts
of men. But often they were not immediately written down at all;
the Prophet would go around spouting them forth to his followers
who, trained from infancy to memorize verses and songs of every
sort with infallible precision, would piously commit them to
memory. As a result of this divinely haphazard procedure, the time
of composition of the different Suras has never been definitely
fixed. Two facts, however, are well established: the revelations,
at first very short, steadily increased in length; and, doubtless
for that reason, the interminable later Suras do not even contain
ashes--for ashes prove that flame was once present--whereas the
earlier songs are occasionally touched with fire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account