Momus Triumphans: or, the Plagiaries of the English Stage (1688[1687])Langbaine, Gerard
General
Momus Triumphans: or, the Plagiaries of the English Stage (1688[1687])
Langbaine, Gerard
English drama -- Bibliography
What is finally remarkable about Langbaine's work, especially in
the Preface to _Momus_ and throughout the _Account_, is his abiding
determination to insert himself into virtually every one of Dryden's
quarrels, no matter how passe. The quality which binds together
Langbaine's heros is not their talent, their common beliefs or their
rectitude in admitting sources, but their mutual fortunes in being
Dryden's adversaries. The list of support he marshals is a long one
and includes Sir Robert Howard and the debate over the rhymed heroic
drama; the group led by Clifford and known as the Rota;[32] _The
Empress of Morocco_ controversy with Settle;[33] Shadwell, Flecknoe and
_Mac Flecknoe_; the Ancients versus the Moderns; Rymer; and Dryden's
attitudes toward the classics, the French, and the English dramatists
of the earlier part of the century. The reiterations of these attacks
come from Langbaine at a time when Dryden was vulnerable to political
and religious charges, and Langbaine does not fail to include
those.[34] Langbaine's wholesale attacks seem, however, to have two
centers. The principal one concerns the charge of plagiarism, which,
as Osborn has shown, was an old one with Dryden, although Langbaine's
strictures against borrowing do not represent the most characteristic
attitude of his time.[35] More precisely, Langbaine focuses on
Dryden's (seeming) _arrogance_ toward the use of source material,
and he would "_desire our Laureat_ ... to shun this, Confidence and
Self-love, as the worst of Plagues" ([a2v]).[36] The second focus,
again one which is seemingly characterized by arrogance, is Dryden's
criticism of the three major pre-interregnum dramatists, "these three
Great Men" (_Account_, p. 136), Shakespeare,[37] Fletcher and Jonson.
Of these the attacks on Jonson and the "thefts" from him are seen
as the most disturbing. Well over a tenth of the Preface and of the
_Account_ are devoted to Dryden, but the next mentioned playwright,
at least in the _Account_, is Jonson. His "Excellencies ... are very
Great, Noble, and Various" (_Account_, p. 281). Everywhere his modesty
and his exemplary uses of the classics and of the English language
are vaunted as a rebuke to Dryden. His opinions on other dramatists
are quoted extensively and approvingly. Behind this admiration lie
Langbaine's love of ancient learning and the continuing affinity of
University men for Jonson. But there is a personal side, too (as there
may be with Dryden). Langbaine's father was a friend of Jonson, who
presented him with an inscribed copy of Vossius,[38] and Langbaine
concludes his article on Jonson with an encomium by his father's friend
Anthony Wood.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account