Money: Speech of Hon. John P. Jones, of Nevada, on the Free Coinage of Silver; in the United States Senate, May 12 and 13, 1890 — John Shaqi
Money: Speech of Hon. John P. Jones, of Nevada, on the Free Coinage of Silver; in the United States Senate, May 12 and 13, 1890Jones, John P. (John Percival)
History
Money: Speech of Hon. John P. Jones, of Nevada, on the Free Coinage of Silver; in the United States Senate, May 12 and 13, 1890
Jones, John P. (John Percival)
Silver question -- Speeches in Congress
The sum total of the precious metals is reckoned at fifty
milliards, one-half gold and one-half silver. If, by a stroke of
the pen, they suppress one of these metals in the monetary
service, they double the demand for the other metal, to the ruin
of all debtors.
M. Rouland, governor of the Bank of France, said:
We have not to do with ideal theories. The two moneys have
actually co-existed since the origin of human society. They
co-exist because the two together are necessary, by their
quantity, to meet the needs of circulation. This necessity of the
two metals, has it ceased to exist? Is it established that the
quantity of actual and prospective gold is such that we can now
renounce the use of silver without disaster?
Baron Rothschild said:
The simultaneous employment of the two precious metals is
satisfactory and gives rise to no complaint. Whether gold or
silver dominates for the time being, it is always true that the
two metals concur together in forming the monetary circulation of
the world, and it is the general mass of the two metals combined
which serves as the measure of the value of things. The
suppression of silver would amount to a veritable destruction of
values without any compensation.
At the session (October 30, 1873) of the Belgian Monetary Commission,
Professor Laveleye, one of the most luminous writers on economic
subjects, said:
Debtors, and among them the state, have the right to pay in gold
or silver, and this right can not be taken away without
disturbing the relation of debtors and creditors, to the
prejudice of debtors, to the extent of perhaps one-half,
certainly of one-third. To increase all debts at a blow
(_brusquement_) is a measure so violent, so revolutionary, that I
can not believe that the Government will propose it or that the
Chambers will vote it.
WHY WAS THE AUTOMATIC SYSTEM INTERFERED WITH?
Some thirteen years ago, as Chairman of the Monetary Commission
appointed by Congress to investigate the causes of the changes in the
relative values of the precious metals, I submitted to this body a
report, in which I took occasion to refer to the motives which evidently
influenced the creditor classes of the western world in destroying the
automatic system of money. From that Report I quote as follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account