Money: Speech of Hon. John P. Jones, of Nevada, on the Free Coinage of Silver; in the United States Senate, May 12 and 13, 1890 — John Shaqi
Money: Speech of Hon. John P. Jones, of Nevada, on the Free Coinage of Silver; in the United States Senate, May 12 and 13, 1890Jones, John P. (John Percival)
History
Money: Speech of Hon. John P. Jones, of Nevada, on the Free Coinage of Silver; in the United States Senate, May 12 and 13, 1890
Jones, John P. (John Percival)
Silver question -- Speeches in Congress
The world has generally favored, theoretically if not
practically, the automatic metallic system, and adjusted its
business to it. Some nations adopted one metal as their standard,
and some the other, and some adopted both. Those that adopted
both metals served as a balance-wheel to steady with exactness
their relative value. The practical effect of all of this was the
same as if all nations had adopted both, because it secured the
entire stock of both at a fixed equivalency for the transaction
of the business of the world. While some nations have changed
their money metal, or, having had paper money, have resumed
specie payments in one metal, the policy of a general
demonetization of one of the metals was first broached only about
twenty years ago. About ten years later a formidable propaganda
was organized to fasten that policy upon the commercial world.
This new school of financial theorists advocate the retention of
metal as the material of money, but favor its subjection to
governmental interference in every respect. Whenever new mines
are discovered, or old ones yield or promise to yield more
abundantly, instead of freely accepting their product in
accordance with the automatic theory, they advocate its rejection
through the restriction or the absolute prohibition of the
coinage of either or both metals, or through the limitation or
the abolition of the legal-tender function of one of them.
Whenever the interests of the creditor and income classes seem to
be in danger of being impaired by an increase in the volume and
decrease in the value of money, or in other words, by a general
rise in prices, these modern theorists are clamorous in
double-standard countries for the demonetization of one of the
money metals, and in single-standard countries for the shifting
of the money function from the metal which promises the most to
the one that promises the least abundant supply. They are
extremely anxious for the retention of the _material_ of which
the money-standard is composed when such material is rising in
value and prices are falling, and exceedingly apprehensive of the
evil and inconvenience which they predict as sure to result from
changing it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account