Moral Poison in Modern FictionJohnson, R. Brimley (Reginald Brimley)
History
Moral Poison in Modern Fiction
Johnson, R. Brimley (Reginald Brimley)
English fiction -- 20th century -- History and criticism; Pornography
2. A recognition of the unmarried mother and the refusal to
boycott a whole class, produce detailed and frank pictures of
"gay life," in which the pleasures and even the moral conquests
are so brought into prominence as to convey the totally false
impression that such conditions are freer, and therefore
better, than prosaic domesticity.
3. The gospel of self-expression in emotion, itself a
fine ideal inspiring sincerity, is too often so violently
proclaimed as to ignore any consideration for others and the
"consequences" to oneself:—the inevitable weakening of the
will.
4. In particular, the glorification of burning passion which
(as a physical fact) cannot be continuous, is revealed to
justify the lie that, as the _nature_ of love changes or grows,
it also turns cold and dies. Therefore, they seek to show that
the noblest love does not last, that men and women alike need
constant change in emotion, that marriage is not a bond but
bondage.
Everywhere, they confound the abuses of truth with truth itself;
proclaim an ideal false simply because it has been degraded and
misunderstood. They condemn because we cannot attain.
Obviously, however, the novelists may still reply, "We are concerned
with life not with ideals. If these things be sin, we must write of
sin." That we all admit. The novel with any ambition towards truth dare
not ignore temptation or the failure to resist. It must reveal human
nature, no less at its worst than its best; face the struggle between
faith and disloyalty to oneself; picture life's cruel ironies and the
tyranny of fate.
_But that can never excuse doubt, or confusion between right and wrong,
exalting evil, or perversion of the truth._
V
THE "SPADE" IDEAL IN FICTION
This has been summarized once for all in his description of what Mr.
W. L. George calls a "sincere" novel: "There would be as many scenes
in the bedroom as in the drawing-room, probably more, given that human
beings spend more time in the former than the latter apartment."
There is nothing sincere in that definition except its nasty flavour;
the lust it suggests. The actual effect, if not the intention, is a
quick shock to our natural instincts.
Any possible value it might appear to possess at first sight, as a
serious argument, has been lost by the insincere reason given. Mr.
George himself is far too good an artist not to know that _real_ life
is _not_ measured by length of hours. Crises are, nearly always, swift.
Too often, a character is lost or won in a moment; we grow old in a
night; gain the happiness of a lifetime by the right word. How many a
man is bound to "spend more time" over his ledger than beside his lady!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account