Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 3 (of 4).—1874-1892Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
History
Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 3 (of 4).—1874-1892
Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901 -- Humor
Ainsworth's story may serve the turn of an Opéra-bouffe Librettist,
and the scamp himself be played by a sprightly actress without much
harm being done to anybody. _Jack Sheppard_, for instance, ought not
to be sanctioned by the Licenser any more than _Claude Duval_, _Dick
Turpin_, or any other drama of a like kind, of which the recognized
motive is the veiled incentive to crime. Still, a raid on Harrison
Ainsworth, notwithstanding the acknowledged mischief that has been
done to the young and ignorant by a perusal of his cracksman's
romance, would scarcely be the same thing, and yet the cases are
sufficiently parallel to admit at least of argument. We should be
inclined to suppress such romances as _Jack Sheppard_, _Rookwood_,
Bulwer's _Claude Duval_, and also _Eugene Aram_, which was so severely
and so justly satirized by Thackeray in _Mr. Punch's_ pages. For the
truth about Jack Sheppard our readers have only to refer to one of the
earliest volumes of _Mr. Punch's_ series, where they will find his
character as described by Ainsworth, and his true character as given
in the Newgate Calendar, displayed side by side in parallel columns.
_There was no sort of romance about the real Jack Sheppard._
Meantime, for want of a better remedy to meet the evil, let parents
and guardians, and those who have charge and direction of the
young idea, keep their eyes open and have a special regard to the
direction in which it shows inclination to shoot. It is just as
ready to derive its nutriment from the "penny healthful," as from
the "penny dreadful," and as a mere matter of commercial enterprise,
the former could be as easily forthcoming and available as the
latter. Philanthropy is continually actively busying itself about
the education of the young--here is something practical for it to
do--let it look to the quality of its _Magazine literature_. It wants
some energy and some capital, but both in these days ought to be
forthcoming. To drive the penny dreadful out of the literary field is
not a task beyond the powers of organization and enterprise. And it is
in this direction that the first steps will be taken in the material
and moral amelioration of "What boys read."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account