Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 3 (of 4).—1874-1892Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
History
Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 3 (of 4).—1874-1892
Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901 -- Humor
The subject recurs in 1889 and 1890, when sensational juvenile
literature is again denounced; but the new stories are more
vigorously condemned than the old, and the Ghost of Jack Sheppard,
in a conversation with the Shade of Dick Turpin, scouts the notion
that _they_ could upset the minds of the young. Why, they weren't in
it with the papers read by everyone everywhere! _Punch_ vigorously
supported the efforts of those who sought to abate the evils of child
insurance, and welcomed the intervention of Magee, then Archbishop of
York, who died while on a visit to London to attend a Committee of
the House of Lords on his Infant Insurance Bill, in May, 1891. But
when the Prevention of Cruelty Bill was in Committee in the summer of
1887, _Punch_ strongly supported the Attorney-General's amendment to
omit from the Bill the words prohibiting the employment of children
under ten in theatres and licensed places of public entertainment. Mr.
Mundella, who was in charge of the Bill, accepted the amendment, but
"Dick Temple, Sam Smith and other superlatively good people objected,"
and it was defeated both in the Committee and the Report stages, to
_Punch's_ undisguised annoyance. After the Bill became law in July,
he added "one word more," and his arguments, if not convincing, are
at least consistent with his life-long sympathy with the professional
actor:--
[Sidenote: _The Stage and Education_]
Well-intentioned persons do a heap of mischief, and talk and write a
lot of nonsense about what they don't understand. There are dangers to
morality ("who deniges of it?") in the Theatrical Profession, as in
every other profession; but these affect the amateur, and those who
go on the stage late in life, not those who are to the manner born.
The loves of poor, honest, hard-working theatrical families, where the
sons and daughters obtain theatrical employment at an early age, are
thoroughly respectable. Their stage-work is not only compatible with
their receiving a sound education, but is a complement of it. Habits
of strict discipline, cleanliness, and domestic thrift are inculcated;
the little children, from the biggest down to "the Widow's Mites"
engaged in a Pantomime, are seldom sick, and never sorry, but do their
work with pleasure, and would probably be willing to undertake even
"more study," rather than be deprived of their theatrical employment
which brings in the money, pays the school, and helps to keep a happy
family together under one roof, which, "be it never so 'umble," is
styled by that dear old English word "home"--and there is no place
like it. The efforts of those who would exclude children under ten
from theatrical work may cause great misery and break up many such
happy homes. We say this in serious earnest, and, from practical
experience, we do know what we are talking about.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account