My empress; twenty-three years of intimate life with the empress of all the Russias from her marriage to the day of her exile — John Shaqi
My empress; twenty-three years of intimate life with the empress of all the Russias from her marriage to the day of her exileMouchanow, Marfa
History
My empress; twenty-three years of intimate life with the empress of all the Russias from her marriage to the day of her exile
Mouchanow, Marfa
Alexandra, Empress, consort of Nicholas II, Emperor of Russia, 1872-1918
themselves to be dissatisfied with what she had done would ever enter
the gates of her Crimean home. She kept her promise, and not even
her mother-in-law was ever invited to look upon the new castle which
Alexandra Feodorovna had built for herself on the shores of the Black
Sea, and which she had made so beautiful.
CHAPTER VIII
LIFE AT CZARSKOI SELO
I have often been asked details about the kind of existence by the
Imperial family in the interior of their home. So long as I was in
their service I never spoke of what I saw, and in general avoided
mentioning anything connected with the family life of my masters. It
seems to me now that I am not committing an indiscretion if I do so,
because I have nothing to say but good of the unfortunate Czar and
Czarina.
They were a most affectionate couple, and to look at them and to hear
them converse with one another one could almost have believed them to
be little “bourgeois” of the type dear to French authors, rather than
powerful sovereigns. They used often to jest together, and to tease
each other in a quiet way, and both were full of fun when left to
themselves. Later on, of course, things changed, and as the political
horizon became darker and darker, the old merry laugh with which the
Emperor and his wife used to make the halls and corridors of the
Czarskoi Selo Palace echo was hushed and could be heard very seldom.
But the sense of humour of Nicholas II. and of his Consort never
deserted them, and they were inclined to look at the joyful side of
things rather than to indulge in pessimism, in all matters that did
not pertain to the administration of their vast Empire. This was the
tragic part of their life, and, being both highly conscientious people,
they suffered cruelly to find that all their efforts to ameliorate the
condition of their people were misunderstood. Of course it is idle
to deny that the weakness of character of the Emperor was greatly to
blame in the series of disasters which finally overpowered him and
his family, but it must also be acknowledged that he never met with
any sincere and disinterested help in the responsibilities of his
arduous task. During the first years of her marriage the Empress kept,
or rather was kept, aloof from everything connected with politics,
which was a great pity, because at that time she might have made
herself useful in many ways. But all the ministers and the advisers
of Nicholas II. were of opinion that his wife had to be relegated to
a subordinate position, and he himself had no desire to initiate her
into the complicated details connected with the government of Russia.
It was only after she had given birth to an heir that the position
of Alexandra Feodorovna became an important one, and that she was
consulted by her husband. By that time the reputation for weakness of
character of the Emperor had become an established fact, and those who
hitherto had ruled him, furious at finding themselves evicted, started
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account