As for the eyes of the cat, they were riveted on the bird with a
fascinated intensity, and said plainly as eyes could speak, and in a
language which the parrot understood only too well, “Green though he be,
this chicken is without doubt good to eat.”
While we watched this scene with interest, ready to interfere whenever
it should seem necessary, Madame Theophile was imperceptibly drawing
nearer to her prey. Her pink nose quivered, her eyes were half shut, her
elastic claws projected and then disappeared again in their velvet
sheaths. Little shivers ran down her spine: she was like an epicure as
he seats himself at table before a dish of truffled chicken, and smacks
his lips in advance over the choice and succulent repast which he is
about to enjoy. This exotic dainty tickled all her sensuous
capabilities.
Suddenly her back curved like a bow which is bent, and with one strong
elastic bound she alighted on the perch. The parrot, seeing his danger,
remarked in a deep bass voice, as low and solemn as that of M. Joseph
Prudhomme, “Hast thou breakfasted, Jacquot?”
This remark created in the mind of the cat an evident dismay. She took a
sudden leap backward. A blast from a trumpet, a pile of plates crashing
to the floor, a pistol shot close to the ear, could not have inspired
more sudden and giddy terror in an animal of her race. All her
ornithological ideas were in one fell moment overturned.
“And on what? On the roast beef of the king?” continued the parrot.
The face of the cat now said, as distinctly as words, “This is not a
bird. It is a gentleman! He speaks!”
“When I on wine have feasted free,
The tavern turns around with me,”
sang the bird in a tremendous voice; for he perceived that the alarm
caused by his words was his readiest means of defence. The cat cast a
questioning glance toward us, and, getting no reassurance in reply, took
refuge under the bed, from which place of safety she could not be
enticed for the remainder of that day.
People who are not accustomed to live with animals, or who, like
Descartes, see nothing in them but irrational organisms, will no doubt
suppose that these designs and reflections which we attribute to birds
and beasts, are pure inventions of our fancy. In this they are mistaken:
we but interpret their ideas, and faithfully translate them into human
speech.
Next day Madame Theophile, regaining courage, made another attempt on
the parrot, which was repulsed in the same way. After that she gave it
up, and accepted the bird as a man.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account