India -- Economic conditions -- 1918-1947; India -- Politics and government -- 1919-1947; India -- Social conditions
“The children of the slave belonged to the master; those of the
wife to the husband. Not even after the death of the husband was
the wife a legal guardian of her own children, unless he made her
so by will. While living he could give them away, and at death
could will them as he pleased. He dictated the form of education
and religion that they should be taught, and if the parents
differed in religion, the wife was forced to teach the husband’s
faith. Like the slave, if the wife left her husband she could take
nothing with her, as she had no legal claim to her children, her
clothing, nor her most personal possessions.
“The law in many lands gave husbands the right to whip their wives
and administer other punishments for disobedience, provided they
kept within certain legal restrictions. Within the memory of those
living in Mill’s day, wife-beating was a common offense in England
and America, husbands contending that they were well within their
‘rights’, when so doing.
“ ... Education, always considered the most certain sign of
individual advancement, was either forbidden or disapproved, for
women. No colleges and few high schools, except in the United
States, were open to women. Common schools were less usual for
girls than for boys and the number of totally illiterate women
vastly exceeded the number of illiterate men. Religion was
recommended to women as a natural solace and avenue of usefulness,
but they were not permitted to preach, teach, or pray in most
churches, and in many singing was likewise barred! The professions
and more skilled trades were closed to them.”
That such a state of things was ever tolerated in the advanced
countries of Europe and America seems to us of India incredible. But
it is, nevertheless, true. As in the case of other social laws, the
subjection of woman was the result of the fundamental ideals (or the
lack of ideals) which governed the western society of those times. Men
were still in that low state of development in which “Might was Right,”
and in which the law of superior strength was the rule of life. No
pretension was made to regulate the affairs of society according to any
moral law. The physical law which sanctioned traffic in human slaves,
at the same time sustained the bondage of the weaker sex.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account