Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others — John Shaqi
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and othersSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others
Steiner, Rudolf
Mysticism
Through the understanding of my inner sense, there is thus disclosed
to me the nature of the relation that obtains between the content of
this sense and the things of the external world. Fichte would say that
without the understanding of this sense, the world falls apart for me
into two halves: into things outside of me, and into pictures of these
things within me. The two halves become united when the inner self
understands itself and consequently recognises clearly what sort of
illumination it throws upon things in the cognitive process. And Fichte
could also venture to say that this inner sense sees only Spirit. For
it perceives how the Spirit enlightens the sense-world by making it
part and parcel of the spiritual world. The inner sense causes the
outer sense-world to arise within itself as a spiritual being on a
higher level. An external object is completely known when there is no
part of it which has not thus undergone a spiritual re-birth. Thus
every external object fits itself into a spiritual content, which,
when it has been grasped by the inner sense, shares the destiny of
self-knowledge. The spiritual content, which belongs to an object
through its illumination from within, merges itself wholly, like the
very self, into the world of ideas, leaving no remainder behind.
These developments contain nothing which is susceptible or even in need
of logical proof. They are nothing but the results of inner experience.
Whoever calls into question this content, shows only that he is lacking
in this inner experience. It is impossible to dispute with him; as
little could one discuss colour with a blind man.
It must not, however, be contended that this inner experience is made
possible only through the special endowment of a few chosen people.
It is a common property. Every one can enter upon the path to this
experience who does not of his own will shut himself against it. This
closing up of oneself against it, is, however, common enough. And in
dealing with objections raised in this direction, one always has the
feeling that it is not so much a matter of people being unable to
attain this inner experience, as of their having hopelessly blocked the
entrance to it with all kinds of logical spiders’ webs. It is almost as
if some one looking through a telescope and discovering a new planet
should yet deny its existence because his calculations have shown that
there can be no planet in that position.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account