Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and othersSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others
Steiner, Rudolf
Mysticism
But with all this there is still in most people the clearly marked
feeling that all that really lies in the being of things cannot
be completely given in what the outer senses and the analysing
understanding can cognise. They then believe that the remainder so
left over must be just as much in the external world as are the
things of our perceptions themselves. They think that there must be
something which remains unknown to cognition. What they ought to
attain by again perceiving with the inner sense, on a higher plane,
the very object which they have already cognised and grasped with
the understanding,--this they transfer as something inaccessible and
unknown into the external world. Then they talk of the limits of
knowledge which prevent our reaching the “thing-in-itself.” They talk
of the unknown “being” of things. That this very “being” of things
shines out when the inner sense lets its light fall upon the things, is
what they will not recognise. The famous “Ignorabimus” speech of the
scientist, Du Bois-Reymond, in the year 1876, furnished a particularly
blatant example of this error. We are supposed to be able to get
in every direction only so far as to be able to see in all natural
processes the manifestations of “matter.” What “matter” itself is, we
are supposed to be unable to know. Du Bois-Reymond contends that we
shall never succeed in penetrating to wherever it is that “matter”
leads its ghostly life in space. The reason why we cannot get there
lies, however, in the fact that there is nothing whatsoever to be
looked for there. Whoever speaks like Du Bois-Reymond must have a
feeling that the knowledge of Nature yields results which point to a
something further and other which Nature-knowledge itself cannot give.
But he refuses to follow the road,--the road of inner experience,
which leads to this other. Therefore he stands at a complete loss
before the question of “matter” as before a dark riddle. In him who
treads the path of inner experience, objects attain to a new birth;
and that in them which remains unknown to outer experience then shines
forth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account