Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and othersSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others
Steiner, Rudolf
Mysticism
My personal soul-life, my thoughts, memories, and feelings, are in me,
because I am a nature-being organised in such and such a way, with a
perfectly definite sense-apparatus, with a perfectly definite nervous
system. I have no right to transfer this my human soul to other things.
I should only be entitled to do so if I happened to find anywhere a
similarly organised nervous system. But my individual soul is not
the highest spiritual element in me. This highest spiritual element
must first be awakened through the inner sense; and this awakened
spiritual element in me is also one and the same with the spiritual
element in all things. The plant appears immediately in its own proper
spirituality to this spiritual element,--I have no need to endow it
with a spirituality like unto my own.
All talk about the unknown “thing-in-itself” loses any kind of
meaning with this conception of the world; for it is just that very
“thing-in-itself” which reveals itself to the inner sense. All such
talk originates simply in the fact that those who talk thus are unable
to recognise in the spiritual contents of their own inner being the
“things-in-themselves.” They think that they know in their own inner
selves mere shadows and schemes without being,--“mere concepts and
ideas” of things. But as they still have a sort of premonition of the
“thing-in-itself,” they therefore believe that this “thing-in-itself”
is concealing itself, and that there are limits set to man’s power of
knowing. One cannot prove to such as are entangled in this belief,
that they must grasp the “thing-in-itself” in their own inner being,
for even if one were to put it before them, they would still never
recognise or admit this “thing-in-itself.” But it is just this
recognition with which we are concerned.
All that Meister Eckhart says is saturated with this recognition.
“Of this take a comparison: A door opens and shuts upon a hinge. If,
now, I compare the outer plank of this door to the outer man, I must
then compare the hinge to the inner man. Now, when the door opens and
shuts, the outer plank moves to and fro, while yet the hinge remains
constantly immovable and is in no way changed thereby. In like manner
it is here also.” As an individual sense-being, I can investigate
things in all directions--the door opens and shuts,--if I do not
spiritually give birth within me to the perceptions of the senses, then
do I know nothing of their nature--the hinge does not move!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account