Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and othersSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others
Steiner, Rudolf
Mysticism
The soul which gives itself up to the inner illumination knows in
itself not only what this same soul was before its illumination; but it
also knows that which this soul only became through this illumination.
“We must be united with God in being; we must be united with God
uniquely; we must be united with God wholly. How shall we be united
with God in being? That must happen in the beholding and not in the
_Wesung_. His being may not become our being, but it shall be our
life.” Not an already existent life--a _Wesung_--is to be known in the
logical sense; but the higher knowing--the beholding--shall itself
become life; the spiritual, the ideal must be so felt by the beholder,
as ordinary daily life is felt by individual human nature.
From such starting points, Meister Eckhart also builds up a pure
conception of Freedom. In its ordinary life the soul is not free; for
it is interwoven with the realm of lower causes, and accomplishes that
to which it is impelled by these lower causes. But by “beholding” or
“vision” it is raised out of the domain of these causes, and acts no
longer as a separated individual soul. The root of being is laid bare
in this soul, and that can be moved to action by naught save by itself.
“God does not compel the will; rather He sets the will free, so that
it wills not otherwise than what God Himself wills; and the spirit
desires not to will other than what God wills: and that is not its
un-freedom: it is its true and real freedom. For freedom is that we
are not bound, but free and pure and unmixed, as we were in our first
outpouring, as we were set free in the Holy Ghost.”
It may be said of the illuminated man that he is himself the being
which from within itself determines what is good and what is evil. He
can do naught absolutely, but accomplish the good. For he does not
serve the good, but the good realises and lives itself out in him. “The
righteous man serveth neither God, nor the creature; for he is free,
and the nearer he is to righteousness, the more he is Freedom’s very
self.” What then, for Meister Eckhart, can evil be? It can be only
action under the influence of the lower mode of regarding things;--the
acting of a soul which has not passed through the state of _Entwerdung_
(un-becoming). Such a soul is selfish in the sense that it wills only
itself. It could not bring its willing outwardly into accord with moral
ideals. The soul having vision cannot in this sense be selfish. Even if
it willed itself, it yet could will only the lordship of the ideal; for
it has made itself into this very ideal. It can no longer will the ends
of the lower nature, for it has no longer aught in common with this
lower nature. To act in conformity with moral ideals implies for the
soul which has vision, no compulsion, no deprivation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account