Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and othersSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others
Steiner, Rudolf
Mysticism
From this it is already obvious that God’s communication to humanity
cannot be conceived after the fashion of the revelation of one human
being to another. This communication may also be cut off, for one man
can shut himself off from another; but God _must_, by virtue of His
very nature, reveal Himself. “It is a sure and certain truth, that
it is a necessity for God to seek us, exactly as if His very Godhead
depended upon it. God can as little dispense with us as we with Him.
Even though we turn away from God, yet God can never turn away from
us.” Consequently, man’s relation to God cannot be conceived of as
though something image-like, something taken from the individual human
being, were contained therein.
Eckhart is thus conscious that it belongs to the perfectness of
the Root-Being of the world to find Itself in the human soul. This
Root-Being indeed would be imperfect, incomplete, if it lacked that
part of its unfoldment which comes to light in the soul. What happens
in man belongs to the Root-Being; and if it did not happen, then the
Root-Being would be but a part of Itself. In this sense, man can feel
himself as a necessary part of the Being of the universe. This Eckhart
expresses by describing his feelings towards God as follows: “I thank
not God that He loveth me, for He may not do otherwise; whether He will
it or no, His nature yet compelleth Him.... Therefore will I not pray
to God to give me anything, nor will I praise Him for that which He
hath given me....”
But this relationship of the soul to the Root-Being must not be
conceived of as if the soul in its individual nature were declared
to be identical with this Root-Being. The soul which is entangled in
the sense-world, and so in the finite, has as such not yet got within
itself the content of the Root-Being. The soul must first develop that
content within itself. It must annihilate itself as an isolated being;
and Meister Eckhart most aptly characterises this annihilation as
_Entwerdung_ (un-becoming or involution). “When I come to the root of
the Godhead, none ask me whence I come and where I have been, and none
doth miss me, for here there is an _Entwerdung_.” Again, the following
phrase speaks very clearly about this relation: “I take a cup of water
and lay therein a mirror and set it under the disc of the sun. The sun
casts out its shining light on the mirror and yet doth not pass away.
The reflecting of the mirror in the sun is sun in the sun, and yet the
mirror remains what it is. So is it about God. God is in the soul with
His very nature and being and Godhead, and yet He is not the soul. The
reflecting of the soul in God, is God in God, and yet the soul is still
that which it is.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account