Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and othersSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others
Steiner, Rudolf
Mysticism
This is as much as to say that all creatures shall be regarded as
created and creation and not regard themselves as I-ness and self-ness,
whereby this knowing is made impossible. “For in whatever creature this
perfect one shall be known, there all creature-being, created-being,
I-ness, self-ness, and everything of the kind must be lost, be and
become naught.”[6] The soul must therefore look within itself; there
it finds its I-ness, its self-ness. If it remains standing there, it
thereby cuts itself off from the perfect. If it regards its I-ness only
as a thing lent to it as it were, and annihilates it in spirit, it will
be seized upon by the stream of the All-Life, of Perfection.
[6] Chap. i., _Book of the Man from Frankfurt_.
“When the creature assumes to itself somewhat of good, as Being, Life,
Knowledge, Power, in short, aught of that which one calls good and
thinks that it is that, or that it belongs to it or comes from it, so
often and so much as that happens, does the creature turn away.” “The
created soul of man has two eyes. The one is the possibility of seeing
in eternity; the other of seeing in time and in creation.” “Man should
therefore stand and be quite free without himself, that is without
self-ness, I-ness, me, mine, for me and the like, so that he as little
seeks and thinks of himself and what is his in all things as if it did
not exist; and he should therefore also think little of himself, as if
he were not, and as if another had done all his deeds.”[7]
[7] Chap. xv., _Book of the Man from Frankfurt_.
One must also take account of the fact in regard to the writer of
these sentences, that the thought-content, to which he gives a
direction by his higher ideas and feelings, is that of a believing
priest in the spirit of his own time. We are here concerned not with
the thought-content, but with the direction, not with the thoughts
but with the way of thinking. Any one who does not live as he does in
Christian dogmas, but in the conceptions of natural science, finds in
his sentences other thoughts; but with these other thoughts he points
in the same direction. And this direction is that which leads to the
overcoming of the self-hood, by the Self-hood itself. The highest light
shines for man in his Ego. But this light only then imparts to his
concept-world the right reflection, when he becomes aware that it is
not his own self-light, but the universal world-light.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account