Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and othersSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others
Steiner, Rudolf
Mysticism
Hence there is no more important knowledge than self-knowledge; and
there is equally no knowledge which leads so completely out beyond
itself. When the “self” knows itself aright, it is already no longer
a “self.” In his own language, the writer of the book in question
expresses this as follows: “For God’s ‘own-ness’ is void of this and
that, void of self-ness and I-ness; but the nature and own-ness of the
creature is that it seeketh and willeth itself and its own and ‘this’
and ‘that’; and in all that it does or leaves undone, it seeketh to
receive its own benefit and profit.”
“When, now, the creature or the man loseth his own-ness and his
self-ness and himself, and goeth out from himself, then God entereth in
with His Own-ness, that is with his Self-hood.”[8] Man soars upwards,
from a view of his “Ego” which makes the latter appear to him as his
very being, to a view such that it shows him his Ego as a mere organ,
in which the All-Being works upon itself. In the concept-sphere of our
text, this means: “If man can attain thereto that he belongeth unto God
just as a man’s hand belongeth to him, then let him content himself and
seek no further.”[9] That is not intended to mean that when man has
reached a certain stage of his evolution he shall stand still there,
but that, when he has got as far as is indicated in the above words,
he should not set on foot further investigations into the meaning of
the hand, but rather make use of the hand, in order that it may render
service to the body to which it belongs.
[8] Chap. xxiv, _Book of the Man from Frankfurt_.
[9] _Ibid._, Chap. liv.
* * * * *
HEINRICH SUSO and JOHANNES RUYSBROEK possessed a type of mind which
may be characterised as genius for feeling. Their feelings are drawn
by something like instinct in the same direction in which Eckhart’s
and Tauler’s feelings were guided by their higher thought-life. Suso’s
heart turns devoutly towards that Root-Being which embraces the
individual man just as much as the whole remaining world, and in whom
forgetting himself, he yearns to lose himself as a drop of water in the
mighty ocean. He speaks of this his yearning towards the All-Being, not
as of something that he desires to embrace in thought; he speaks of it
as a natural impulse, that makes his soul drunken with desire for the
annihilation of its separated existence and its re-awakening to life in
the all-efficiency of the endless life. “Turn thine eyes to this being
in its pure naked simplicity, so that thou mayest let fall this and
that manifold being. Take being in itself alone, that is unmoved with
not-being; for all not-being denies all being. A thing that is yet to
become, or that has been, is not now in actual presence.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account