Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and othersSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others
Steiner, Rudolf
Mysticism
Whoever thinks like this about all knowing, has only such a conception
of knowing as is applicable to external things. The sensible factor in
anything always remains external for us; therefore we can only take up
into our knowledge pictures of whatever is sensible in the world. When
we perceive a colour or a stone, we are unable, in order to know the
being of the colour or the stone, to become ourselves the colour or
the stone. Just as little can the colour or the stone transform itself
into a part of our own being. It may, however, be questioned whether
the conception of such a knowing-process, wholly directed to what is
external in things, is an exhaustive one.
For Scholasticism, all human knowing does certainly in the main
coincide with this kind of knowing. Another admirable authority on
Scholasticism[11] characterises the conception of knowledge with which
we are concerned in this direction of thought in the following manner:
“Our spirit, allied in earth-life with the body, is primarily focussed
upon the surrounding bodily world, but ordered in the direction of the
spiritual therein: the beings, natures, forms of things, the elements
of existence, which are related to our spirit and offer to it the rungs
for its ascent to the super-sensuous; the field of our knowledge is
therefore the realm of experience, but we must learn to understand what
it offers, to penetrate to its meaning and thought, and thereby unlock
for ourselves the world of thought.”
[11] Otto Willman, in his _History of Idealism_, vol. ii., p. 395.
The Scholastic could not attain to any other conception of knowledge,
for the dogmatic content of his theology prevented his doing so. If he
had directed the gaze of his spiritual eye upon that which he regards
as an image only, he would then have seen that the spiritual content of
things reveals itself in this supposed image; he would then have found
that in his own inner being the God not alone images Himself, but that
He lives therein, is present there in His own nature. He would have
beheld in gazing into his own inner being, not a dark abyss, an endless
emptiness, but also not merely an image of God; he would have felt that
a life pulses within him, which is the very life of God itself; and
that his own life is verily just God’s life.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account